IluvBsissa
IluvBsissa OP t1_j9nzd1x wrote
Reply to comment by rand3289 in MIT researchers makes self-drive car AI significantly more accurate: “Liquid” neural nets, based on a worm’s nervous system, can transform their underlying algorithms on the fly, giving them unprecedented speed and adaptability. by IluvBsissa
Interesting...so without the combustion engine, we wouldn't be far from a steam-punk dystopia today ?
IluvBsissa OP t1_j9l49kp wrote
Reply to comment by rand3289 in MIT researchers makes self-drive car AI significantly more accurate: “Liquid” neural nets, based on a worm’s nervous system, can transform their underlying algorithms on the fly, giving them unprecedented speed and adaptability. by IluvBsissa
But any advances in neural networks is good news for AI in general, thus self-driving, no ?
IluvBsissa t1_j9j9ml9 wrote
Reply to comment by astonzhang in [R] Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Language Models - Amazon Web Services Zhuosheng Zhang et al - Outperforms GPT-3.5 by 16% (75%->91%) and surpasses human performance on ScienceQA while having less than 1B params! by Singularian2501
Dr. Zhang, thank you so much. Please can you tell us more about your model's performance ? How would it do on standard MMLU ? Can it be improved by increasing parameters count ? The paper didn't mention if the human testers were average human or experts ?
IluvBsissa t1_j9j8ubb wrote
Reply to What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
I don't get it. Why are they comparing their model's performance to regular humans and not experts, like every other papers ? Does it mean these tests are "average difficulty" ? I read somewhere that GPT3.5 had a 55.5% score on MMLU, while PalM was at 75 and human experts 88.8. How would this CoT model perform on standards benchmarks, then ? I feel scammed rn.
IluvBsissa t1_j9j81ht wrote
Reply to comment by Cryptizard in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
My disappointment is unmeasurable and my day is ruined.
IluvBsissa t1_j9j7tmn wrote
Reply to comment by Cryptizard in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
Are you joking or serious ?
IluvBsissa t1_j9j6v5v wrote
Reply to comment by Destiny_Knight in A German AI startup just might have a GPT-4 competitor this year. It is 300 billion parameters model by Dr_Singularity
If these models are so smol and efficient, why are they not released ?? I just don't get it. I thought PaLM was kept private because it was too costly to run to be profitable...
IluvBsissa t1_j9j5t08 wrote
Reply to comment by Destiny_Knight in A German AI startup just might have a GPT-4 competitor this year. It is 300 billion parameters model by Dr_Singularity
Are you angry or impressed ?
IluvBsissa t1_j9j5rld wrote
Reply to A German AI startup just might have a GPT-4 competitor this year. It is 300 billion parameters model by Dr_Singularity
Germany saving Europe again ! No wait..
IluvBsissa OP t1_j9fz40x wrote
Reply to MIT researchers makes self-drive car AI significantly more accurate: “Liquid” neural nets, based on a worm’s nervous system, can transform their underlying algorithms on the fly, giving them unprecedented speed and adaptability. by IluvBsissa
Anyone here to confirm if it's significant or not ? Are we closer to lvl 5 autonomy ?
IluvBsissa t1_j96ox3l wrote
Reply to comment by ipatimo in What’s up with DeepMind? by BobbyWOWO
Hol' up.
IluvBsissa OP t1_j8n3znd wrote
Reply to comment by Ortus14 in We don't need AGI for the Singularity to happen. We need ultra-powerful Simulators. by IluvBsissa
But what if we just simulate a fundamental embryonic cell and let it grow in a simulated womb, to see how it develops and...aww shit we don't know how the womb works either...and maybe just basic tissues in a simulated petri dish ? Idk.
IluvBsissa OP t1_j8mc2kv wrote
Reply to comment by ImoJenny in We don't need AGI for the Singularity to happen. We need ultra-powerful Simulators. by IluvBsissa
Well that's what I said. We need more AI specialized in simulating biological systems and new transistors to increase the rate of progress exponentially. I doubt an AGI would be able to get us there
IluvBsissa t1_j67saun wrote
Reply to MULTI·ON: an AI Web Co-Pilot powered by ChatGPT that browses the web and automates the tasks by Schneller-als-Licht
What about ADEPT ACT-1 ?
IluvBsissa t1_j47gpxh wrote
Reply to Realistic humanoid robotic arm that uses artificial muscles has full range of motion and can lift a dumbbell by HumanSeeing
This is very old...and not actually useful.
IluvBsissa t1_j3w2mnf wrote
Reply to comment by V_Shtrum in Escape Velocity from Bullshit Jobs by maxtility
https://www.vox.com/2018/5/8/17308744/bullshit-jobs-book-david-graeber-occupy-wall-street-karl-marx
This interview clarifies a few points. I think Bullshit Jobbers are also random positions created by rich rentier to artificially inflate their company, thus their pride. "I manage a consulting agency of over 300 people", sounds really nice at a fancy dinner, even though half employees are underpaid young interns.
IluvBsissa t1_j3w1bi1 wrote
Reply to comment by V_Shtrum in Escape Velocity from Bullshit Jobs by maxtility
Yes, that's his definition.
I would maybe add : if a machine can do your job better than you, and at a lower cost, you have a Bullshit Job. Eg : Pharmacists, data entry mf, tellers...some people love their bs jobs tho, e.g sugar industry Lobbyists who get paid millions each year to veto new national health measure in Congress.
I think a few accademic tried to venture a lil bit in these new waters, but didn't generate any new insights. I think we should ask them on Reddit.
IluvBsissa t1_j3vn3mv wrote
Reply to comment by V_Shtrum in Escape Velocity from Bullshit Jobs by maxtility
Except for Graeber's, Have you seen any books, articles explaining Bullshit Jobs phenomena a bit more seriously/scientifically ?
IluvBsissa t1_j3vn0wd wrote
Reply to comment by TheSecretAgenda in Escape Velocity from Bullshit Jobs by maxtility
As someone who worked in corporations, I have to say it : yes, Bullshit Jobs exist. Even more so in the US and Japan, the Kings of unnecessary bureaucratic bullshits and forms filling. According to McKinsey (2016), 69% of administrative jobs could be automated. But we refuse to do so, and keep using tons of papers instead of digitalizing all info in the cloud. Maybe when Boomers and X finally f**k off the economy, we may see some changes, but I doubt it. We need a bloody revolution.
IluvBsissa t1_j9pzh0q wrote
Reply to comment by sumane12 in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
There is a lot of worship is SEA tho.