JeromePowellAdmirer

JeromePowellAdmirer t1_j0xjfdr wrote

Those aren't the type of regulations he means. The most he would go there (cause it's the most anyone proposes) is making elevators fit stretchers in slightly upright positions instead of fully extended, and allowing single loaded corridors, both like in Europe. Those changes are about as radical as he could possibly go on building codes and he will never go that far.

3

JeromePowellAdmirer t1_j0xisrb wrote

Politicians don't respond to the average person. In NYC zoning changes get brought to community board input. Working people sure as hell ain't making those meetings on weekday afternoons, even weekday evenings are too hard for people with kids. Politicians respond to whoever shows up there, which is retired rich people, and not the electorate. Also the electorate in most council elections is retired rich people anyways.

2

JeromePowellAdmirer t1_j0woe6u wrote

Yep, paying off the construction of a road is one thing but roads take significant amounts of further investment to maintain. They take exponentially more when they're in tunnel form and any work on them requires dealing with a mess of other cables and tunnels. There's no fair way to do it without user fees.

5

JeromePowellAdmirer t1_j0e52nt wrote

Yes it will. 20% or more of LI is young people wanting a city life pushed out there cause city life is too expensive. Child free living is more popular than ever. Make city rent cheaper by building more units and they move here and some likely ditch their cars in the process, making traffic better. If they're child free, they contribute to taxes but not education spending = better services.

−1