Kaarssteun
Kaarssteun t1_iwhtr3s wrote
Reply to comment by randomrealname in models superior to GPT-3? by [deleted]
from here: "Galactica models are trained on a large corpus comprising more than 360 millions in-context citations and over 50 millions of unique references normalized across a diverse set of sources. This enables Galactica to suggest citations and help discover related papers."
Always remember that the outputs of a language model are however, very prone to hallucination. I would not trust its outputs.
Kaarssteun t1_iwhs4yl wrote
Reply to comment by phriot in models superior to GPT-3? by [deleted]
let me know how it ends up doing!
Kaarssteun t1_iwhqov0 wrote
Reply to comment by phriot in models superior to GPT-3? by [deleted]
which is what the "generate more" button is for. One click & it extends by 400 tokens. Do that until it's done
Kaarssteun t1_iwhdd7s wrote
Reply to models superior to GPT-3? by [deleted]
Well, you sure know how to time a reddit post. This released two hours ago
Kaarssteun t1_iwbawuu wrote
Reply to comment by Sashinii in AI Drew This Gorgeous Comic Series, But You'd Never Know It by rpaul9578
Common Sashinii W
Kaarssteun t1_iw9eezc wrote
Reply to comment by userbrn1 in Meta AI Has Built A Neural Theorem Prover That Has Solved 10 International Math Olympiad (IMO) Problems — 5x More Than Any Previous Artificial Intelligence AI System by Shelfrock77
True. Its AI dept might launch it into the stratosphere sometime.
Kaarssteun t1_iw9avp0 wrote
Reply to comment by PrivateLudo in Meta AI Has Built A Neural Theorem Prover That Has Solved 10 International Math Olympiad (IMO) Problems — 5x More Than Any Previous Artificial Intelligence AI System by Shelfrock77
Same company. Their AI department is stellar, the other... project... is tainting its reputation somewhat.
Kaarssteun t1_iw56lk3 wrote
Reply to comment by Johnny_Glib in Ai art is a mixed bag by Nintell
This one's different, given it's by AI that shows no signs of stopping, in a field that was believed to be irreplacable. That bullet hits different from job replacement. This is job purging, with huge ramifications.
Kaarssteun t1_iw4xvvw wrote
Reply to Ai art is a mixed bag by Nintell
Yep. There's people depending on art as a job, and through the market of commissions not being nearly as lucrative as it was before, they are losing their dream job. That deserves sympathy.
However dehumanizing this next point might sound, it is extremely important. Everyone must realize AI is on its way, and let go of the solid societal belief that labor is essential to living a comfortable life. It might no longer be so in the (near) future. Artists are simply the first to take this irreversable bullet; and that's causing some incredible exposure.
Kaarssteun t1_ivvepny wrote
Reply to comment by legrnjoeqng in Will Text to Game be possible? by Independent-Book4660
Noone wants the twitter algorithm. Thousands wanted the NovelAI model. Motivated people can do anything
Kaarssteun t1_ivvczsz wrote
Reply to comment by legrnjoeqng in Will Text to Game be possible? by Independent-Book4660
extremely unlikely and too pessimistic. It takes one person to leak a model, one group of people motivated enough - we'll get it sooner or later.
Kaarssteun t1_ivfrlax wrote
Reply to comment by Kaarssteun in Essential reading material? by YB55qDC8b
additionally i enjoyed Life 3.0 by Max Tegmark
Kaarssteun t1_ivfr5g9 wrote
Reply to Essential reading material? by YB55qDC8b
obvious: The singularity is near by Ray Kurzweil
Kaarssteun t1_ivbjmuw wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in In the face on the Anthropocene by apple_achia
not gonna crush your dreams, because i will make it my life's mission to make that happen!
Kaarssteun t1_iv874lz wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in TSMC approaching 1 nm with 2D materials breakthrough by maxtility
whats wrong with them pointing out a misleading claim?
Kaarssteun t1_iuta63g wrote
Reply to Do you think we could reach a singularity without the invention of agi? by Effective-Dig8734
To surpass human-level intelligence you need human-level intelligence. No getting around the definitions of the singularity
Kaarssteun t1_iurvcjt wrote
Reply to comment by Sashinii in Robots That Write Their Own Code by kegzilla
Every passing day I am more tempted to create the international Party of the Future
Kaarssteun t1_iudfpti wrote
Reply to comment by sir_duckingtale in What's the AI scene like in China? by TachibanaRE
Reddit is an american corporation
Kaarssteun t1_iuayvq8 wrote
Reply to comment by PrivateLudo in Experts: 90% of Online Content Will Be AI-Generated by 2026 by PrivateLudo
I'm very impressed by the authors in that regard. I myself wouldn't have thought this would be possible before Dalle2 - and nowadays people think my timelines are batshit crazy.
Kaarssteun t1_iuaykye wrote
Reply to comment by Sashinii in Experts: 90% of Online Content Will Be AI-Generated by 2026 by PrivateLudo
Who are you and what did you do to Sashinii?! bold of you to assume it's not happening in 2023. What if the exponentials are exponential! :P
Kaarssteun t1_iu9rh1u wrote
Kaarssteun t1_itjut5o wrote
Reply to comment by fractal_engineer in What will you do to survive in the time between not needing to work anymore to survive and today? by wilsonartOffic
Elaborate
Kaarssteun t1_itiii79 wrote
Reply to comment by fractal_engineer in What will you do to survive in the time between not needing to work anymore to survive and today? by wilsonartOffic
Plenty of other industry leaders disagree with you. What makes you think otherwise?
Kaarssteun t1_isz620w wrote
Reply to comment by YoghurtDull1466 in Since Humans Need Not Apply video there has not much been videos which supports CGP Grey's claim by RavenWolf1
How familiar are you with AI?
Kaarssteun t1_iwncqco wrote
Reply to Decoding fMRI based brain activities and reconstructing images with accurate semantics and image features using diffusion model by MysteryInc152
If you're into FDVR, this is huge. The first step to artificial stimuli streamed directly to your brain is understanding how we interpret them in the first place. While the nature of neural networks may not bring us, as humans, close to intellectually understanding the brain, this obviously shows an insane degree of "comprehension". Perhaps the tool we need to decode our brains simply are artificial ones.