KaiDaiz

KaiDaiz t1_iqtw5jh wrote

and less trash also makes a giant difference. face it, there's not enough bins, alley or front sidewalk space to hide our trash that makes its removal economical & practical. Only way we can start talking about sensible trash storage is to store less of it. Start drastically reducing amount of trash...when our reduced trash output can fit in whatever bin design and haul away for cheap then we can talk about it

0

KaiDaiz t1_iqtgkrt wrote

Doesn't matter if you put the trash in alley or bin, still a mountain of it. Yes we do generate a lot of trash. Take a look at amount of trash generated in Japan on trash day per household. They charge the folks money per pound in some areas and naturally they have nil trash. Ours are practically free to toss as much trash we want. It's a bargain here.

Do what other cities already do here in USA and elsewhere, make residents use official sanction trash bags. First x free, anything else have to buy. Heavy enforcement and fines

19

KaiDaiz t1_iqp5vvh wrote

1907 legal decision that does not hold municipal governments responsible for damage due to “extraordinary or excessive” rainfall, according to the letter from Lander.

Basically saying they not responsible for acts of god and in event of a working sewer that overflow beyond the amount of flow it was spec for.

if the sewer was broken and fail to do job you have a case. if sewer was overwhelm but fully function as design, no case

18

KaiDaiz t1_iqo82v5 wrote

Home insurance typically don't cover much for sewerage backup or not even cover at all. Need separate policy. Also even if they do cover most insurance plans even flood don't cover lost belongings in basements. They will cover some equipment to a certain amount

16

KaiDaiz t1_iqnyp6l wrote

Not going to work. Last time this was successful, they dug up the pipe to show it was damaged/crushed hence failure of city and them liable for damage. Doubtful this the same for this case.

7