Kengfatv

Kengfatv t1_je9u8ih wrote

They could have given us a whole new map. They could have given us the entirety of the old one, and 50% more to explore.

There's a lot you can expect, when they expect us to be paying the same price for the sequel as we did for the original. Yet they feel they can put less work in.

−4

Kengfatv t1_je9ts95 wrote

I was ready to buy a switch just to play this game, and then I saw the map.

Despite not liking the new art direction that Zelda has taken, and hating weapon durability, I still wanted to give it a chance. But if they're going to release a sequel without even giving us a new map, that's a joke.

On top of that, the music was a major part of what made zelda so great for me, and ever since skyward sword, its just been massively downhill. There were a few great songs in skyward sword, but only a single memorable song in BOTW.

It's not even the same game anymore, and it's not a good thing. I wish they would have just made a new IP for this shit, and continued to make more traditional zelda titles.

0

Kengfatv t1_je6ujkn wrote

There is no point being made. There's no reason they can't sell games on PC and on their console, like every other company does. It makes no sense not to, they'd make millions more.

in fact consoles are even sold at a loss, specifically because they expect to make more off of individual game sales. So to have someone else emulate the console for free, and even act as a platform they could sell their games on without porting it over to PC would be nothing but beneficial to them.

You're basically trying to defend someone that goes "I have an infinite supply of icing that anyone can take from for free. I can give everybody the option of buying it if I want. But I'll only sell it to people that buy it with my cake mix. Everyone else gets it free."

like why? What's the purpose? You aren't preventing piracy, and you're losing money in the process. How does this help you?

1