Lithuim
Lithuim t1_jef37ab wrote
I’ve heard some discussions about using AI for enemy chatter.
Main character chatter would have to be a little more scripted to keep it on task, but it doesn’t really matter what Stormtroopers are bantering about.
Lithuim t1_jeaco9c wrote
Reply to comment by chosen-username in Eli5: why are there tigers in Siberia but not in Scandinavia? by chosen-username
There were prehistoric lion species in north/central Europe during the ice age, as far north as the UK.
Scandinavia was largely covered in glaciers at the time so I don’t think their range extended that far north.
Lithuim t1_je1mix9 wrote
Reply to comment by Efficient_Face_4099 in Seeking game recommendations: PC game, heavy focus on exploration, low stress, low difficulty. Extra points if you get a pet. by gththrowaway
Just go behind the Aurora for peace and quiet.
Lithuim t1_je1fb2x wrote
Reply to Seeking game recommendations: PC game, heavy focus on exploration, low stress, low difficulty. Extra points if you get a pet. by gththrowaway
If she likes the way WoW plays, an ARPG like Diablo, Torchlight, or Grim Dawn might be the way to go.
If she’s more about just sniffing around an environment, Minecraft or Subnautica.
Lithuim t1_jd4nlrx wrote
The gigantic population certainly helps, they have four times the sample size as the US.
Then there’s the mix of medical care that’s good enough to keep these deathly ill infants alive but not good enough to fix them and an abundance of cell phones to capture it.
Places that are even more impoverished might not keep such an unlucky infant alive long enough to document it. Places that are wealthier will fix it surgically.
Lithuim t1_jaeirzs wrote
Reply to ELI5: Does a volcano have a 'floor' under the lava? or does it go straight to the centre of the earth? by _zobi1kenobi
The entire crust, including the volcano, sort of “floats” on the Mantle.
The Mantle isn’t quite liquid, but it’s not quite solid either. It’s highly viscous molten rock under considerable pressure. It “flows” over very long time scales but you couldn’t swim in it.
Think of it like really thick tar. You could walk on it, but it’s not solid.
Lithuim t1_jaehh2e wrote
Reply to ELI5: Is a high speed transcontinental rail system viable in the US with the Rockies/Appalachian ranges? by [deleted]
The problem is more of a cost/economic one than a construction one - there are already plenty of freight rail lines that go through nearly all of the US’s varied topography.
Making it competitive with the established airline industry and actually getting the infrastructure built without descending into a California High-Speed Rail money pit is the problem.
Cross country travel is a “solved” problem with extensive aircraft infrastructure. A system that is slower and requires additional infrastructure is a hard sell without some very obvious and immediate benefits.
Lithuim t1_jadvy54 wrote
Reply to There's nothing worse than a gaming sesh being cut short from crashes or the power going out before you got a chance to save. Tell your story and move along, Partner. by NVSuave
Used to be a lot worse before (most) games started autosaving when you changed cells or did certain things. It’s been a long time since I can remember losing hours of progress in one fell swoop.
Lithuim t1_j6ops8y wrote
Reply to comment by NdavG100 in ELI5: Why are people so obsessed with uncovering whats in area 51? by NdavG100
Americans have a long standing distrust of authority and government, including their own.
Lithuim t1_j6ne7su wrote
Reply to ELI5 - When filling multiple choice bubbles at random why only go with 1 letter? by Stellar_Panda
If the answers are truly distributed randomly, then any random selection of letters would produce roughly the same score.
Whether they’re actually random or not would depend on who wrote the test.
Whether you’d get a better score by guessing or not would depend on the way the test is graded - many standardized tests subtract 1/4th of a point for wrong answers so that a random guesser will get a zero.
Lithuim t1_j6mxsex wrote
Reply to comment by CyraFen in Eli5: what does the brain control in the body? by Parking_Tale7916
A lot of the digestive system is also automated, although it too can be overruled by the brain.
Lithuim t1_j65gi5g wrote
Reply to ELI5: Is aluminum common enough that it’s not a concern, or are we just really good at recycling it? by RestrictedCervical
Both.
Earth’s crust is 8% aluminum, so while there are certainly easy and hard sources to tap it is also the most common metallic element available.
We also recycle it in large volumes because it’s easy to rework and cheaper to rework than extract new.
Lithuim t1_j60kqr3 wrote
Reply to ELI5: How is donating equipment to participate in war, not considered going to war? by lloyd705
It’s different because Russia doesn’t want to declare war on the US.
That’s the only distinction.
The Taliban did the same to Al Quaeda and the US definitely did consider material support an act of war, and retaliated in kind.
But they did so from a position of vast military strength. Russia will make the same accusations today about material support to their enemies, but they won’t act on it because they can’t afford to fight that fight.
Lithuim t1_j5kualk wrote
Reply to comment by 321ECRAB123 in Eli5: do noble gases really have full valence shells by 321ECRAB123
“Valence” refers to the highest level of orbital(s) where electrons relatively freely wander between structures with similar energy levels. How many electrons this is will vary with atomic size.
1s is the lowest orbital, and has no friends - so helium’s valence shell is just two electrons.
Then there’s a big jump.
2s is similar in energy to 2p, and so electrons will move between the two. To fill this next valence layer you need eight electrons.
Then there’s a big jump
3s is similar to 3p, again giving you an 8-valence level.
Then there’s a big jump.
4s is where you’re now at energy levels high enough to generate a d-orbital, and 4s, 3d, and 4p form all sorts of wacky structures. This layer has 18 in the valence level.
Then… you guessed it… there’s a big jump.
“Full valence” is where these big jumps occur. Adding or subtracting an electron from a full structure is relatively difficult. You’re either forming an entirely new structure on top of the existing one or destabilizing a fully spin-paired configuration. Both are difficult, and so atoms and ions with full valence are highly chemically stable.
Lithuim t1_j5kqas7 wrote
Reply to comment by 321ECRAB123 in Eli5: do noble gases really have full valence shells by 321ECRAB123
There is no 1p, 1d, or 2d structure. These atoms are too small and compact to support the more complex and diffuse electron configurations required to stuff dozens of them into the same space.
The 3d does exist, but it’s higher energy than the 3p and 4s and so doesn’t fill in until later.
Eventually you’ll fill an f-orbital too.
Lithuim t1_j5komfz wrote
The heavier noble gases do have a full d-shell as well.
You can fill four successive s orbitals before a d-shell configuration becomes energetically favorable, so there is no d-shell for Helium, Neon, and Argon.
Krypton has a filled d-orbital. Helium only has a full 1s, no p or d.
Lithuim t1_j2al3jf wrote
Reply to eli5 why is the winter solstice not on the same day as when the earth is closest to the sun? by o_pyrite
The solstices are a function of Earth’s axial tilt, occurring when you’re pointed at the minimum and maximum angle.
This is independent of the Earth’s orbital characteristics, although the northern winter solstice does coincidentally occur near the Earth’s “perihelion” - the closest approach.
Lithuim t1_j2ahfuu wrote
Reply to comment by Tegasauras in ELI5 Tidal acceleration of the moon. Does the mass of the moon affect this? by Tegasauras
Any middle school algebra textbook I guess. The gravitation equation is thankfully very simple.
Lithuim t1_j2adeje wrote
The moon’s (or any object’s) gravity is directly proportional to its mass, so yes.
If the moon was a hollow paper mache sphere you wouldn’t get nearly as much tidal effect here on Earth.
The force between the two is G(m1 x m2)/r^2
The moon does exert tidal drag on the Earth, slowly sapping rotational energy and making days longer.
The much more massive Earth has done the same to the moon, dragging it so hard that it’s now permanently fixed with one side facing Earth.
Lithuim t1_j2a7xvc wrote
Reply to comment by Chillay_90 in eli5: do animals have as many oral health problems as humans do? Do their teeth last the majority of their lifetime? by Chillay_90
Yeah mother nature is more of a Thunderdome kinda woman. More social animals do sometimes get some help past their prime from their younger kin, solitary carnivores are pure kill or be killed.
Lithuim t1_j2a5uss wrote
Reply to eli5: do animals have as many oral health problems as humans do? Do their teeth last the majority of their lifetime? by Chillay_90
Animal teeth last their entire lifetime, because they starve and die as soon as there’s a problem.
They don’t eat much acidic or sugary foods so rapid decay isn’t all that likely, but they definitely do have problems as they age. It’s a significant cause of mortality among aging carnivores since their teeth are also their primary survival mechanism.
Lithuim t1_j28t64b wrote
That’s more a political and lobbying question than one of actual definitions.
They’re classified as “platforms” because they desperately lobby the world’s governments to be classified as such - removing most liability for whatever garbage people post.
Changing them to a “publisher” would be catastrophic for their business model, as they are now liable for everything that gets posted.
Lithuim t1_j28pa8x wrote
Bananas are fairly easy to cultivate in tropical climates, so large plantations have sprung up in Central America, Africa, and East Asia.
They can be grown year-round, and are fairly productive plants that start popping out bananas rapidly - you don’t have to wait years and years like many other fruit-bearing trees.
A lot of other fruits are seasonal, slow growing, or difficult to cultivate outside of their native range.
There are downsides though - banana farming is labor intensive and the plants are highly susceptible to some infections because they’re all clones.
Lithuim t1_j257gr3 wrote
You’re moving one way
The other car is moving another.
Your vehicles collide and transfer momentum, so now your vehicle is moving in some third direction.
You, however, continue moving in the original direction until something stops you.
If you’re smart, this is a seatbelt.
If you’re less smart, the now-deformed doors unlatch or the windshield pops out and you continue moving down the pavement.
Lithuim t1_jef5q27 wrote
Reply to Would you enjoy playing AI-generated games? by BrilliantDouble4469
AI might suffer from the same “mile wide, inch deep” problem that procedural generation already has.
Sure a computer can write 800 pages of dialogue, but can it tell a story? Can it keep the character personalities consistent? Can it make timely cultural and political references? Can it be funny? Can it remember its own plot?
It can probably handle side quest and enemy banter dialogue, but I have my doubts that it can take full creative control. AI is more regurgitating than creating.