Looking4APeachScone

Looking4APeachScone t1_jdyw2m3 wrote

That's not for me to decide. Either way, I'm not saying to ban the content, but tagging it appropriately so that headline readers don't run with misinformation would be prudent.

3

Looking4APeachScone t1_jdxpwu3 wrote

I'll say it again; poor sample size or misleading "research" should be tagged appropriately. ESPECIALLY in this sub. Meaning it should be a strictly enforced rule. It's cool if this is a first step of a more robust research process, but we should not have to waste our time with this stuff when it's so poorly designed and appears manipulative with questionable motives.

12

Looking4APeachScone t1_j8ao1gq wrote

I call this the five listen rule. While you may know instantly that you like something, it is also equally possible that it's the 4th or 5th time you've heard it and you just didn't notice it before because it was new and completely foreign to you.

I've found that 5 listens is generally a good measuring stick to know if I like something or not.

3