Makhnos_Tachanka
Makhnos_Tachanka t1_j9moxog wrote
Reply to comment by Bewaretheicespiders in Relativity Space on Twitter: You’ve asked, “Wen Launch?” and to that, we say...👇 Catch us live at Launch Complex 16 in Cape Canaveral, FL on March 8, 2023 to watch the world’s first 3D printed rocket fly. 🚀 #GLHF by allforspace
I'm sure it'll have plenty of impact, just as falcon 1 did, as a technology demonstrator. Really, terran 1 is a demonstration of their ability to print the rocket, stick all the avionics together with their engines, and get to orbit. For them to have any chance of securing the funding for terran r, which actually does take advantage of the 3d printing process, they kinda have to start small. And ultimately, what they're really building here is the ability to build rockets on the moon and mars, which is a big deal in and of itself. Same goes for spinlaunch, for that matter. They're both building launch vehicles with technologies that don't make that much sense on earth, but do make a ton of sense once you get off it.
Makhnos_Tachanka t1_j7nl4nd wrote
Reply to comment by SgtPepe in The James Webb Space Telescope just found an asteroid by total accident, its smallest object yet by pecika
Because those things are fucking enormous.
Makhnos_Tachanka t1_j24trec wrote
Reply to comment by HeebieMcJeeberson in What if we kept pursuing nuclear spacecraft propulsion? by rosTopicEchoChamber
Oh that's nothing. A dusty plasma fission fragment rocket can deliver an ISP of 1-2 million seconds, using technology with already high TRLs.
Makhnos_Tachanka t1_j1c2w6i wrote
Reply to comment by go_comatose_for_me in Northrop Grumman clears key hurdle for space-based solar power by PhyneasPhysicsPhrog
Yeah it's not a damn microwave oven. They're just not going to be that powerful on the ground. You need big ass antennas covering a lot of area to collect the power. Even if you wanted to fry birds with it, it would be a significant engineering challenge achieving that level of beam collimation.
Makhnos_Tachanka t1_iyz55hb wrote
Reply to comment by fail-deadly- in U.S. Space Force chief: The use of space technology in Ukraine ‘is what we can expect in the future’ by Corbulo2526
Great now we just need to wait several days for the target to align itself with the orbit at the right time and ah fuck they shot it down
Makhnos_Tachanka t1_iwhvhay wrote
Reply to comment by Routine_Shine_1921 in How many different companies now have built a rocket and used it to deliver anything or people to space (besides government organizations like NASA and the Russian equivalent)? by Courcy6185
Everyone always forgets Pegasus. And Antares (sort of).
Makhnos_Tachanka t1_jdygrqt wrote
Reply to comment by jaibhavaya in Are galaxies just giant accretion disks around super massive black holes? by darthvadercock
It's not a coincidence, it's just physics. Any rotating system like this will tend to sort objects by mass, with the heaviest at the middle. You can see this if you just take some sand and swirl it in a cup with some water. The largest grains will end up at the center. Why? They're the heaviest, and it takes the most energy to fling them around. If we simplify a galaxy to a two body system, you will imagine that a light star and a heavy black hole will orbit each other with the star making a much longer orbit than the black hole, which may be almost stationary. In a galaxy, you don't have a two body system, you have every body in the entire galaxy acting together, and relativistic effects and all that, but the same thing is happening. The distribution of masses in a galaxy broadly follows what's called the Einsato profile, which essentially says the densest objects will have the lowest radius. Of course, galaxies come in all shapes and sizes, and come in various states of development (a galaxy that has just collided with another may have a random distribution) but over time, a galaxy will organize itself with the densest objects at its center.