The criteria comes down to effective aggression e.g consistently landing punches not just throwing desperate haymakers which is mostly what Paul threw in this fight
ring control e.g which fighter is controlling what is happening and enforcing their style
Defence is also a factor e.g blocking, slipping, parrying strikes
Then there is significant strikes throwing lots of punches which aren’t hitting the target isn’t scored the same as landing flush hard shots
Also Paul didn’t land more shots than Fury he landed a higher percentage of the shots he threw but he attempted about half the amount of strikes that Fury did
Paul landed 49 strikes from 157 thrown whereas Fury landed 88 from 302 strikes
Fury landed the more significant shots, was controlling the fight from start to finish and was doing a better job of deflecting shots so very few of what Paul threw landed clean
Many_Television8895 t1_ja7r6pb wrote
Reply to ELI5: How does professional boxing scoring work? by [deleted]
The criteria comes down to effective aggression e.g consistently landing punches not just throwing desperate haymakers which is mostly what Paul threw in this fight
ring control e.g which fighter is controlling what is happening and enforcing their style
Defence is also a factor e.g blocking, slipping, parrying strikes
Then there is significant strikes throwing lots of punches which aren’t hitting the target isn’t scored the same as landing flush hard shots
Also Paul didn’t land more shots than Fury he landed a higher percentage of the shots he threw but he attempted about half the amount of strikes that Fury did Paul landed 49 strikes from 157 thrown whereas Fury landed 88 from 302 strikes
Fury landed the more significant shots, was controlling the fight from start to finish and was doing a better job of deflecting shots so very few of what Paul threw landed clean