As we do in america......stretch it.

Bad move. If he accuses him of this and gets it to work any supporter of any riot or has given aid or comfort would be unable to run. This would hurt democrats far more than republicans

Being in Pawtucket also leaves you on the line to Seekonk MA and Attleboro MA. Attleboro is cost effective. Various places to live there also.

Far Cleaner than Building 19.....Same overall vibe though.

There is a list of the highest peak hikes in New England and there is a challenge series for the very serious. Also look into HikeSafe situations to improve safety.

No would be the shortest answer but i can elaborate.

The scenario you describe has no understanding of human beings or society as a whole. It makes illogical jumps into what an individual may want from the government and people in general.

Overall you could force 100 people to live this way but sooner or later errors and changes would occur and certain people would expect better treatment or better things due to their position in the group. In 100 people there will always be one leader available and seeing no other leader appears to be provided that person will lead a 10% group of followers into taking over the group and elevating the leader and his followers to the ruling class and casting the rest to various degrees of peasantry.

Even the long standing Hippie Communes have discovered that without changing out people regularly and a strict oversight from an outside council that they are overrun within a few years.

So while the thought process that creates this fantasy is meant for good, its really just a case of magical thinking.

Disaster of an install. Had to be ripped out completely when done.

Avoid Lou's in East Providence

Try airport pizza, I find it very cleansing.

Not wanting to split hairs but there is an electric motor in those things.

I have seen a huge amount of Ebikes on the East Bay bike path. I think its being allowed due to it being green.

There is a USDA slaughter house in Wesport. You can look into that.

The law is about taxing the rich. Sold to the people as a tax to improve schools and roads.

The repercussions unless stated otherwise is you need to pay the contracted amount. The lease is supposed to give the landlord a guaranteed period of time you will be paying and a definitive amount of time you are allowed to stay. Some leases have an out such as pay two months but that's negotiated before the lease is signed.

Not paying is dishonest and gives him the right to take you to court and demand payment.

They put their hand out last time, they got paid. Why not try again?

If you wander around that area there are a lot more opportunities to go. East Providence could end up with major revenue with very little investment. Helping their city, and preventing tax increases.

I think you are looking for someone to install what is waiting to be rehabbed or rezoned. There is already a business area across the street from it with waterfront features. There is industrial right next door. Up the road is various commercial districts. The layout says more housing. Not mixed use.

I think it was the year before last that there was a severe shortage of salt. There are substitutes but so far I have not heard of anyone using Beet juice in New England.

Its near a run down commercial area just waiting for for some investment.

Is there a ranking for RI politicians on what they cost compared to what they stole? Enough is enough already with RI complaints over nonsense because they go to the voter booth every year and vote to get screwed in taxes and graft. Look at the idiots the state has put in congress putting on show with nothing for the state. If you want to put these people in office its time to stop complaining about how the states in shambles and nobody in Washington cares. You picked it, enjoy it.

Complain if you like but at least your mayor is doing something about the wasted opportunities along the waterfront in his city. Is it for profit, absolutely. You would complain twice as much if it was built with tax payer funds.

My suggestion? Pay it.

My approach to voting is my approach to life. I use basic ethics. I won't take from someone something that is not needed. I absolutely will not single out a group to pay more just because they are perceived as able to pay. This is terrible legislation that will backfire and that's not just due to ethics, it's due to basic common sense.

If you watch the comments what they want is a tax on the wealthy and what its for is simply am excuse for what they want. They are a people without any ethics and the more i see it, the less I want to be here. I will probably follow the millionaires out the door as I am already establishing assets elsewhere, and those are not taxed by Mass. Wait till they find out they are just repeating history and the outcome was less money for the state.

We are already discovering our mistakes in too much funding for schools. Our town has a 15% management cost before we get to the actual school. They are taking on construction projects in their budget. Nobody can explain the empty buses situation well. In a very well paid state teachers salaries are keeping up and thats not counting their fringe benefits. Class sizes have dropped to 20 or less students with aids in almost every class through elementary school. Meanwhile the output is a less educated student. So regardless of how this vote goes we are going hold the line on our spending until inflation get it back to some sort of normalcy.

Its time for some real change in education and more money is simply not the answer.