Maxpowr9

Maxpowr9 t1_iufok6v wrote

There are even swingers clubs in Providence.

Seriously, Boston's "adult" nightlife is in chastity at this point. Rent too expensive to be able to live alone and bump uglies with someone (good luck trying to do with (multiple) roomies. Hardly any strip clubs (amusingly, most of them male stripper clubs) and I don't think there are any sex clubs in Boston.

15

Maxpowr9 t1_iu0qtua wrote

That's how a lot of other major cities have schools/universities. Even when I studied abroad at RMIT, I had classes way up on the 16th floor. I just chalk it up as more NIMBYism being anti-skyscraper and wanting to keep some silly provincial feeling instead of being a world class city.

3

Maxpowr9 t1_iu05im3 wrote

The Age of the CBD (Central Business District) is over. You need more mixed development aka housing, so CBDs don't become ghost towns. They're already empty on the weekends and now they're pretty empty on the weekdays. Those restaurants/retailers aren't gonna stay in business if people are WFH.

I'm sure someone will make a snide comment but I am also 100% fine with the housing in Financial District being all luxury housing.

113

Maxpowr9 t1_itxlum8 wrote

Pretty much agree.

Especially with Boston proper, there really isn't any land that isn't already developed and if there is, there's a very good reason why it isn't (geological, toxic, preserved, etc.) The only real option for growth is to build up.

>I think we’re going to see the government having to step in with incentives to make it worth their while before housing development picks back up.

What eventually will need to happen is eminent domain property, especially near transit, to build denser housing. It's wildly unpopular but necessary.

3