MediumLong2
MediumLong2 t1_ixf565j wrote
Reply to comment by black_brook in Ancient Egyptian mummification was never intended to preserve bodies by IslandChillin
I think it's a little rude to call them pre-science. They had amazing engineers that could build giant pyramids and move heavy blocks of stone really high up off the ground via a clever system of ramps, pulleys, and possibly slave labor.
MediumLong2 t1_ixe5hej wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Reading the Bible as source material by Saxon2060
I'm in this sub because I like nonfiction books.
MediumLong2 t1_ix9jic2 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Reading the Bible as source material by Saxon2060
I disagree. I think reading the bible has negative worth. As in, if you read some of it, you're likely worse off than if you hadn't read from it.
>should be able to recognise a reference being made with six pomegranate seeds
>should equally be able to recognize a reference being made to a strongman who doesn't cut his hair.
In the real world, being able to recognize and understand these references isn't worth much compared. Whereas the time it takes to read and learn them is worth a lot.
MediumLong2 t1_ix8zg6u wrote
Reply to Reading the Bible as source material by Saxon2060
There's nothing in the bible worth reading, IMHO.
MediumLong2 t1_iui9opg wrote
Reply to Anyone who’s read “12 rules for life” by JBP finds it so harsh and unforgiving? by newbalancewearer
When I listened to the audiobook, his words suggested to me that he is a horrible person.
MediumLong2 t1_j2e45u5 wrote
Reply to I read Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and I didn't find a deeper meaning in the story. Am I dumb? by -greek_user_06-
Fiction books never have a deeper meaning, IMHO.