Mrg220t
Mrg220t t1_j77wzfc wrote
Reply to comment by shewy92 in 2 arrested in central California shooting that left 6 dead, including mother clutching 10-month-old son | CNN by Creams0da
Why wasn't that piece of information in the headline?
Should be "2 arrested in central California gang shooting that left 6 dead." That's it.
Mrg220t t1_j76yp76 wrote
Reply to comment by super_delegate in 2 arrested in central California shooting that left 6 dead, including mother clutching 10-month-old son | CNN by Creams0da
If the 16 year old decided to put her own kid in danger by being in a gang then she's partly responsible for the baby's death.
I have issue with the title of this post. It's framing it as if it's a random mass shooting. When it's not.
Mrg220t t1_j75kqzk wrote
Reply to 2 arrested in central California shooting that left 6 dead, including mother clutching 10-month-old son | CNN by Creams0da
> “The suspects and the victims have a long history of gun violence, heavily active in guns, gang violence, gun violence, and narcotics dealings,” Boudreaux said, adding, “the motive is not exactly clear at this point.”
So it's gang on gang violence then? Why frame it as if it's a random shooting?
Mrg220t t1_j77x533 wrote
Reply to comment by shewy92 in 2 arrested in central California shooting that left 6 dead, including mother clutching 10-month-old son | CNN by Creams0da
I'm blaming the mum for the death of the infant? Of course.
It's her fault to be involved in gangs and to endanger her baby.
Do you not blame parents that put their kids in danger willingly?
The title obviously left out an important part of the shooting which is that both the victims and the perpetrators are gang members.
That's like saying "Thousands of people shot to death in Europe today". Without telling people that it's in the war in Ukraine.