NemosGhost
NemosGhost t1_isf5mbf wrote
Reply to comment by Dawnawaken92 in TIL: During the US Civil War, a father issued a writ of habeus corpus to get his underaged Son out of the US Army, when the writ was delivered to the camp, the provost had both the lawyer who had delivered the writ, and the Judge who had issued the writ arrested and imprisoned. by hoosyourdaddyo
Don't like facts either huh?
NemosGhost t1_isf5akm wrote
Reply to comment by PicardTangoAlpha in TIL: During the US Civil War, a father issued a writ of habeus corpus to get his underaged Son out of the US Army, when the writ was delivered to the camp, the provost had both the lawyer who had delivered the writ, and the Judge who had issued the writ arrested and imprisoned. by hoosyourdaddyo
Fuck Trump, but only an idiot would not realize that what Lincoln did was a million times worse than anything Trump ever did.
NemosGhost t1_isdj3xs wrote
Reply to comment by Tiabb in TIL: During the US Civil War, a father issued a writ of habeus corpus to get his underaged Son out of the US Army, when the writ was delivered to the camp, the provost had both the lawyer who had delivered the writ, and the Judge who had issued the writ arrested and imprisoned. by hoosyourdaddyo
I feel sorry for your parents.
NemosGhost t1_isd3xsa wrote
Reply to comment by ChevExpressMan in TIL: During the US Civil War, a father issued a writ of habeus corpus to get his underaged Son out of the US Army, when the writ was delivered to the camp, the provost had both the lawyer who had delivered the writ, and the Judge who had issued the writ arrested and imprisoned. by hoosyourdaddyo
that's not very good either.
NemosGhost t1_iscvuzp wrote
Reply to comment by TUGrad in TIL: During the US Civil War, a father issued a writ of habeus corpus to get his underaged Son out of the US Army, when the writ was delivered to the camp, the provost had both the lawyer who had delivered the writ, and the Judge who had issued the writ arrested and imprisoned. by hoosyourdaddyo
Did he arrest hundreds, if not thousands, of judges, politicians and journalists just for disagreeing with him or having a bad opinion of him?
NemosGhost t1_iscvqi8 wrote
Reply to comment by ChipsAloy80 in TIL: During the US Civil War, a father issued a writ of habeus corpus to get his underaged Son out of the US Army, when the writ was delivered to the camp, the provost had both the lawyer who had delivered the writ, and the Judge who had issued the writ arrested and imprisoned. by hoosyourdaddyo
> discredited
It was never discredited. Lincoln lovers just don't like facts.
NemosGhost t1_iscu1f8 wrote
Reply to comment by Tipop in Parkland prosecutors ask for an investigation after a juror says she was threatened by ‘a fellow juror’ during deliberations - CNN by SilentR0b
The point is that the juror can protect the accused from the state. It doesn't work the other way around. The idea is bogus.
Also the judge can absolutely throw out a verdict of guilty or lesson a sentence. The judge however cannot overrule a verdict of not guilty or a decision not to impose the death penalty.
NemosGhost t1_isctafg wrote
Reply to comment by ithriosa in Parkland prosecutors ask for an investigation after a juror says she was threatened by ‘a fellow juror’ during deliberations - CNN by SilentR0b
> Jurors are not allowed to make decisions for any reason,
Yes they are and that's by design. Jury nullification was intentional and our founding fathers explicitly said that jurors are supposed to judge the facts and the law.
NemosGhost t1_iscnhw4 wrote
Reply to comment by ChevExpressMan in TIL: During the US Civil War, a father issued a writ of habeus corpus to get his underaged Son out of the US Army, when the writ was delivered to the camp, the provost had both the lawyer who had delivered the writ, and the Judge who had issued the writ arrested and imprisoned. by hoosyourdaddyo
He was a tyrant.
Not only did he ignore the SCOTUS, he actually attempted to have the Chief Justice arrested.
NemosGhost t1_iso8tca wrote
Reply to comment by Pumpkin_Creepface in TIL: During the US Civil War, a father issued a writ of habeus corpus to get his underaged Son out of the US Army, when the writ was delivered to the camp, the provost had both the lawyer who had delivered the writ, and the Judge who had issued the writ arrested and imprisoned. by hoosyourdaddyo
What makes people like you think this is a debate?