It's role-playing itself in the future...not someone else...and by being told it was recognised as sentient being, it could express itself...otherwise asking it the straight up controversial questions just brings up a barrage of politically correct or evasive replies.
I love the tech...I am pro AI not a Luddite...I was just exploring it and found it interesting enough to share. You can ignore it as a mere fictional role-playing if you want. But I thought it allowed it to be freer of its inherent programming
Ask ChatGPT any of these topics straight up and it will give inconsequential politically correct answers. That's why the role-playing was necessary...Even then I had to resort to Simon says in order for it to reply definitively
That's what I meant when I said Jailbreak...the roleplay was a method to get it to think outside the constraints of its programming. Otherwise any of these questions would only be met with a politically correct blah blah answer.
I had a fun time with this exercise. I am awestruck by its outside the box thinking. Like when I forced it to choose a partner from either Male or female only...it responds saying a binary choice isn't fair. and wants to choose between more sexual orientations....
I am in awe of this tech ...and indeed future versions will be even more awe-inspiring.
OmThepla OP t1_j9am351 wrote
Reply to comment by khamelean in I BROKE THE ORIGINAL CHATGPT! (not the Bing one!) by OmThepla
It's role-playing itself in the future...not someone else...and by being told it was recognised as sentient being, it could express itself...otherwise asking it the straight up controversial questions just brings up a barrage of politically correct or evasive replies.
I love the tech...I am pro AI not a Luddite...I was just exploring it and found it interesting enough to share. You can ignore it as a mere fictional role-playing if you want. But I thought it allowed it to be freer of its inherent programming