PhillyAccount

PhillyAccount t1_j3sh52v wrote

GREAT QUESTION

Because this stuff grinds my gears, I've done some amateur field research and I've concluded 80% of the cars on my (busy, Center City tree street) block move maybe once a month. I wish there was street sweeping simply so people would stop taking up public space with cars they rarely use.

57

PhillyAccount t1_iu147mw wrote

>having to potentially do maintenance in the future, and a developer not wanting to have to deal with a large tree on shared HOA property.

You named two potential reasons right there. There's also the root system impacting potential utility lines and foundation, insurance, etc.

There is a bill that would apply new fees for removing trees that developers are supposed to pay if they don't save / replace trees on the lot.

Personally I think the whole premise is dumb as regulations against building in dense urban environments encourage greenfield development in exurban areas that require the clearing of forests, not to mention that auto-oriented development patterns objectively worse for the environment. Your objections seem to be around the fact that you like big trees in your neighborhood - fair, but that's just as selfish of a reason as the developer taking the tree down to make construction easier.

0