Yeah I agree with that and have written extensively about it. Everyone draws a line of the amount of technological progress they consider to be acceptable. Conservatives tend to draw that line very early on. As progress is accelerating, we are now crossing the lines drawn by progressive people. My point isn’t about politics, but that we are now beginning to face resistance from people we traditionally haven’t had issues with.

That’s the very young-end of the millennial generation. Millennials are as old as 41 right now. The average millennial is in their 30’s. That’s not old, but it’s at the point where people generally start families, build lives, and begin favoring stability over change.

No your mom’s pussy is just to cavernous from giving birth to your fat ass. I paid for sex but I went spelunking instead 💀

I’m not saying that it’s only progressives doing this, just that it’s also a growing tendency among them. It’s obviously worse among conservatives and will likely remain so for the foreseeable future.

Progressives are beginning to shift more anti-technological progress because of the fact that aging-millennials are a major foundation of the American progressive movement, and the fact that many far-left people have a general sense of cynicism regarding technological advancement because its perpetuated by major corporations, often to fulfill their own corporate interests (this one is justified).

I am trying to get one from your mom because she can’t perform in bed

I am 25 and have finished my bachelor’s a while ago. Going onto Masters right now.

I said nothing about homework; just that backlash against emerging technology in favor of antiquated social systems will increasingly become more of a liberal phenomenon.

Yet people thought I was silly for predicting that liberals are emerging neo-Luddites.

That will likely look like a resounding success compared to a war on AI

This is the quality discussion I frequent this sub for

I am; but having safe medicines be able to go straight to human trials is still huge

Well most of them. Utah Arrays for example are more capable of neuron-level micro imaging and deeper brain monitoring. You also have implants for Parkinson’s that are more capable of DBS. Neuralink is a model that uses less energy, which is cool but it isn’t as effective.

Neuralink is actually pretty inferior to other BCIs already on the market

In a sense; medicine can already do a ton to prevent and even reverse balding to an extent. r/tressless has good advice regarding this

That’s why reforming the FDA needs to be priority #1. The good news is that we just made huge progress regarding the FDA process. It is now a lot easier to skip animal trials and do human trials.

That is so far off into the future and hypothetical that it simply isn’t worth hypothesizing about, because we don’t know what either cultural preferences will be like or what technology they would even have access to.

He’s just behind the times. The meta is no longer denying radical technological advancement because the past few years have disproven that. Now it’s about how it’s apparently a bad thing.

It’s low effort, but it is also regarding Futurology.

Obviously yes. Almost not even worth asking the question because it’s so obvious

I assume that you’re talking about this article. As far as I am aware, it went nowhere. It appears to have only been cited once according to research gate and only to point out the fact that it is speculative.

The issue is that we also can’t really test this. The most massive atom we have created so far is Oganesson with an atomic number of 118. We have gotten nowhere near the 145 required to test this; and such an element likely exceeds the superheavy island of stability.

For 115-118 that we have synthesized; no anti-gravitational properties observed as far as I am aware.

Also; we probably have a bit of a wobble and the galaxy is deep in the Universal sticks

True. And as bad as Reddit is; the anti-technology drivel on every other site is almost way worse

100%. Reddit is generally an anti-bellweather for mainstream society, but here they agree with mainstream society. Statistically speaking; most people are anti-technological progress

Because you’re on Reddit, and Reddit seems to be mostly dominated by Luddites.

Anton Petrov covers the study at about 3:24.