PossibleHipster
PossibleHipster t1_iudvryu wrote
Reply to comment by Tacos_truck in Filing for Unemployment with Company that serially fires employees by marqui4me
Depending on what state they are in they can still have a legally required break that they were denied. E.g. California.
But like, maybe you should go read their post again because it sounds like you clearly didn't understand parts of it.
PossibleHipster t1_iudv368 wrote
Reply to comment by Tacos_truck in Filing for Unemployment with Company that serially fires employees by marqui4me
Like they said, they thought they were closing. They didn't know they were on a short shift...
Also depending on the state they could still have a legally required break for the number of hours they worked.
PossibleHipster t1_iuduos3 wrote
Reply to comment by Tacos_truck in Filing for Unemployment with Company that serially fires employees by marqui4me
It's in the 1st sentence?
PossibleHipster t1_iudxkvs wrote
Reply to comment by Tacos_truck in Filing for Unemployment with Company that serially fires employees by marqui4me
I'm not sure why you are hellbent on assuming they were not legally required to get a break. There are a ton of state laws that require breaks.