Potato_Octopi
Potato_Octopi t1_j2egrn6 wrote
Reply to comment by cyanrarroll in ELI5: Why do companies require annual budget be spent 100%? by angrybird7677
It's more of a matter of if the thing is really needed or just a 'nice to have' while budget dollars are still available.
Potato_Octopi t1_j2eashg wrote
Reply to comment by cyanrarroll in ELI5: Why do companies require annual budget be spent 100%? by angrybird7677
Yes, but spending $100 to save $20 in taxes still nets you down $80.
That said, sure, if you're having a good year letting everyone spend every dollar in their budget makes sense. You'd reduce taxable income and leave some meat on the bone for next year in case budgets need to be slashed.
Potato_Octopi t1_j2dw2wk wrote
Budgets can be pretty big, and buying a few things extra to fill out the budget isn't a big deal.
Budgets get changed all the time. If you don't use it this year it may be gone the next. Getting authorization to exceed budget can be difficult, while spending what's already authorized is easy.
Take the converse.. if everyone is hyper incentivized to come in below budget you get scrooges that pay poorly, understaff and remove free coffee from the office. You get a bad place to work.
Potato_Octopi t1_j2dt9pq wrote
Reply to comment by Generallybadadvice in ELI5: Why do companies require annual budget be spent 100%? by angrybird7677
Sure, when a company has a good year bonuses are generally higher.
Potato_Octopi t1_j2dr8sk wrote
Reply to comment by cyanrarroll in ELI5: Why do companies require annual budget be spent 100%? by angrybird7677
What difference does that make?
Potato_Octopi t1_j2dr5b1 wrote
Reply to comment by angrybird7677 in ELI5: Why do companies require annual budget be spent 100%? by angrybird7677
Storing money in a coffer isn't an inherent good. You should either be improving the company with that cash or returning it to shareholders.
If you let cash pile up the business with either issue a dividend, share buyback or make an acquisition, etc.
Potato_Octopi t1_j2ayy2n wrote
Reply to TSLA decline is over, opening a violent rally! Those who are bold make money, those who are timid watch! by OwenLiu0810
IIRC deliveries are announced next week and should be a catalyst higher and carry until earnings hit. Post earnings depends on margins and the macro environment.
Potato_Octopi t1_j27u5cu wrote
Reply to comment by Stonk_owner in I want you to think about this chart, how real is money? by Stonk_owner
Gold is silly money.
Potato_Octopi t1_j1z9fl2 wrote
Reply to Is 4k blu ray worth it? by G00bre
I like it, but it depends a lot on your budget. I wouldn't prioritize over a good TV and sound system. I'd also suggest limiting 4k blue ray to particularly good and rewarchable movies.
Potato_Octopi t1_ixz6q0f wrote
Reply to Swings and roundabouts by Infamous_Sympathy_91
Can't see energy and finance getting back to 36% of the index.
Potato_Octopi t1_ix3ti8d wrote
Reply to comment by Daily_the_Project21 in Higher energy prices are a call for more renewables and maybe nuclear, not more pipelines by TeacherGuy1980
>Do you think because it'll take time that we just shouldn't do it?
I literally wrote that I want us to do it.
Potato_Octopi t1_ix1smv6 wrote
Reply to Higher energy prices are a call for more renewables and maybe nuclear, not more pipelines by TeacherGuy1980
Sure, but that only works if we can actually get things like nukes built quickly and efficiently. I don't think we can replace pipelines with renewables alone.. we need a lot of power for heat in the winter and solar isn't as productive in the winter.
Would love to see a big nuke / renewable build out next recession, but big builds need a long time to plan and approve.
Potato_Octopi t1_iwjcb0f wrote
$2.29 / dozen at my nearest Hannaford. $2.99 / 18.
If it's in shortage and expensive where you are, buy less. Buy seasonal / on sale first.
Potato_Octopi t1_ivfaha0 wrote
Nat Gas is like 2x as expensive as a year ago. Price is up way more than that in Europe.
Potato_Octopi t1_iuaxsbl wrote
Reply to comment by NoMoLerking in Mass. Tax Refunds Will Start To Flow On Tuesday by plawwell
There's no reason to think this year will be the new forever normal. Years of surplus and deficit come and go.
Potato_Octopi t1_iu2k4p6 wrote
Reply to comment by VulcanTrekkie45 in Who is is that keeps dumping hundreds of people in unsuspecting Massachusetts towns? by VulcanTrekkie45
I'd think they have quite a few challenges not just immediate kitchen access.
Do you have a few dozen apartments you can lend them and improve the situation?
Potato_Octopi t1_iu2i4vw wrote
Reply to comment by VulcanTrekkie45 in Who is is that keeps dumping hundreds of people in unsuspecting Massachusetts towns? by VulcanTrekkie45
Hotel rooms don't typically have kitchens.
Potato_Octopi t1_iu2f56f wrote
Reply to Who is is that keeps dumping hundreds of people in unsuspecting Massachusetts towns? by VulcanTrekkie45
Putting people in a hotel doesn't sound like just dumping folks off.
Potato_Octopi t1_iu2ezka wrote
Reply to comment by extraaverageguy in Who is is that keeps dumping hundreds of people in unsuspecting Massachusetts towns? by VulcanTrekkie45
>Why is the government allowing the free flow of illegal immigrants into the country??????
They aren't. The US does not have an open border.
Potato_Octopi t1_is2m4wh wrote
Reply to comment by paganlobster in Getting Paid Lunches in MA by stuartroelke
They also need to sleep and eat other meals during their life. You want to pay people to sleep too?
Cleaner to just ban lunch and start the shift later.
Potato_Octopi t1_irykjat wrote
Reply to comment by MoreGuitarPlease in Getting Paid Lunches in MA by stuartroelke
Just have people work 40 hrs no lunch break. Otherwise the employer isn't getting anything out of you eating and will adjust overall comp.
Potato_Octopi t1_iry5ztg wrote
Reply to comment by mrlolloran in Getting Paid Lunches in MA by stuartroelke
If you want more pay just ask for that. I don't see why "paid lunch" is a compelling argument. You're not working, nor doing work prep. You're taking care of yourself just like breakfast, dinner or whatever. The fact that leaving the worksite can be inconvenient due to travel time is.. whatever.
Potato_Octopi t1_iry5ouh wrote
Reply to comment by stuartroelke in Getting Paid Lunches in MA by stuartroelke
> I believe that employees—especially those with hourly wages—should get paid more.
But why not just advocate for that?
>And lunch is not the same as free time. It’s built into work because it keeps employees working effectively (and safely)—especially manual laborers—and is time that aught to be compensated.
And that argument is job specific. Office worker may be better off with some light snacking during the day. Lunch only became the norm with factory work.
Potato_Octopi t1_irxyvv0 wrote
Reply to comment by mrlolloran in Getting Paid Lunches in MA by stuartroelke
MA is not a right to work state. Are you thinking "at will employment"?
It sounds like you just want to get paid more and think "paid lunch" is some hot idea it isn't.
Potato_Octopi t1_j2hxnun wrote
Reply to comment by notwearingatie in Me leaving 2022 heading into 2023! by barkingt18
The environment has been improving a lot. More forests, and less air and water pollution.
MAD or a war between great powers is low. We actually had big wars 100 years ago.