Potato_Octopi

Potato_Octopi t1_j2dw2wk wrote

Budgets can be pretty big, and buying a few things extra to fill out the budget isn't a big deal.

Budgets get changed all the time. If you don't use it this year it may be gone the next. Getting authorization to exceed budget can be difficult, while spending what's already authorized is easy.

Take the converse.. if everyone is hyper incentivized to come in below budget you get scrooges that pay poorly, understaff and remove free coffee from the office. You get a bad place to work.

2

Potato_Octopi t1_j1z9fl2 wrote

I like it, but it depends a lot on your budget. I wouldn't prioritize over a good TV and sound system. I'd also suggest limiting 4k blue ray to particularly good and rewarchable movies.

1

Potato_Octopi t1_ix1smv6 wrote

Sure, but that only works if we can actually get things like nukes built quickly and efficiently. I don't think we can replace pipelines with renewables alone.. we need a lot of power for heat in the winter and solar isn't as productive in the winter.

Would love to see a big nuke / renewable build out next recession, but big builds need a long time to plan and approve.

4

Potato_Octopi t1_iry5ztg wrote

If you want more pay just ask for that. I don't see why "paid lunch" is a compelling argument. You're not working, nor doing work prep. You're taking care of yourself just like breakfast, dinner or whatever. The fact that leaving the worksite can be inconvenient due to travel time is.. whatever.

1

Potato_Octopi t1_iry5ouh wrote

> I believe that employees—especially those with hourly wages—should get paid more.

But why not just advocate for that?

>And lunch is not the same as free time. It’s built into work because it keeps employees working effectively (and safely)—especially manual laborers—and is time that aught to be compensated.

And that argument is job specific. Office worker may be better off with some light snacking during the day. Lunch only became the norm with factory work.

2