Previous_Floor
Previous_Floor t1_jbl6xx1 wrote
"My husband and I just moved to River Ave (Wanskuck) from the Netherlands and feel a bit unsettled by the looks of it."
Your instincts are not wrong.
Previous_Floor t1_jbl65za wrote
Reply to comment by beta_vulgaris in Wanskuck/Elmhurst safe for walking by Secret_Yesterday7625
>Since you’re the local expert on crime, can you pull up some stats about the people who have been walking, minding their own business and were victims of crime in this area?
Insincere question as you are well aware that those stats don't exist for this area or any area.
Previous_Floor t1_jbkxrmk wrote
Reply to comment by Secret_Yesterday7625 in Wanskuck/Elmhurst safe for walking by Secret_Yesterday7625
>We live north of admiral, but i think it will be fine! Thank you!
Wanskuck isn't an area to be taking walks - especially when dark.
The people telling you that your only risk is getting hit by a car are people who are not even remotely familiar with the area.
Previous_Floor t1_jbjj8hh wrote
River Ave (Wanskuck) between Admiral Street and Douglas Ave = bad
River Ave (Elmhurst) between Admiral Street and Chalkstone Ave = good
River Ave (Valley) between Chalkstone Ave and Valley Street = bad
​
Edited to add: OP, this is accurate info. It will likely get downvoted though. And not because the info isn't accurate. A bunch of weirdos on here downvote all of my posts because they (falsely) believe I'm a former banned member who caused a lot of trouble.
Previous_Floor t1_jbdt62q wrote
Reply to Bricks With Homophobic Anti-Leftist Messages Shatter Red Ink’s Windows by Alphabet_Mafia_69
Unlike many on here, I don't subscribe to the idea that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend".
This isn't simply right versus left. It's an extreme right hate group versus people who embrace and push an ideology that goes against everything our country stands for.
I don't understand why anyone would choose to support either side.
Previous_Floor t1_jbcs1en wrote
Reply to comment by thehillshaveI in Re: Racism in Federal Hill. by frog20-1
AND YOU'RE DOXXING THE OLD MAN WITH YOUR CHANNEL 10 LINK
Previous_Floor t1_jbcq3si wrote
Reply to comment by thehillshaveI in Re: Racism in Federal Hill. by frog20-1
Again, you're not fooling anyone.
The old man apologized. Whether or not it was sincere, he took corrective action. It's over.
And yet here you are...still trying to incite violence. Pathetic.
Previous_Floor t1_jbckeww wrote
Reply to comment by thehillshaveI in Re: Racism in Federal Hill. by frog20-1
You're too much of a coward to admit it. Although you kind of already did when you said "call the cops then nerd" in response to me saying "Whether you realize it or not, you're inciting violence".
https://www.reddit.com/r/providence/comments/11l0xfh/re_racism_in_federal_hill/jbbxh3f/?context=3
Not to mention the cowardly way you went about firing an employee.
Previous_Floor t1_jbci3dv wrote
Reply to comment by thehillshaveI in Re: Racism in Federal Hill. by frog20-1
>i haven't once encouraged anyone to hurt this guy.
Not in so many words, but you're not fooling anyone.
Previous_Floor t1_jbcgg64 wrote
Reply to comment by thehillshaveI in Re: Racism in Federal Hill. by frog20-1
>i'm not.
Maybe not, but you're encouraging others to do it.
Previous_Floor t1_jbcc23k wrote
Reply to comment by canibringmydog in Re: Racism in Federal Hill. by frog20-1
>I love how you post literally every crime in Providence but also defend this old fuck? What’s wrong with us? What the heck is wrong with you?
I'm not defending him. I also have serious doubts about his story, but I have a real problem with the mentality I'm seeing here. It's pretty clear to me that several people want this old guy to be physically harmed. That is not ok. And that is something I absolutely won't support.
And what on earth does this have to do with posting crime articles?
Previous_Floor t1_jbc12i6 wrote
Previous_Floor t1_jbbxh3f wrote
Reply to comment by thehillshaveI in Re: Racism in Federal Hill. by frog20-1
Whether you realize it or not, you're inciting violence.
And that is unacceptable.
Previous_Floor t1_jbbq5vw wrote
Reply to comment by thehillshaveI in Re: Racism in Federal Hill. by frog20-1
I suppose you'd prefer if someone went and beat the old man to a pulp?
How about growing the fuck up, giving him the benefit of the doubt, and letting it go.
What's wrong with you people...
Previous_Floor t1_jbbmd3k wrote
Reply to comment by Throwaway1231200001 in Re: Racism in Federal Hill. by frog20-1
>Wait for the post from OP about his father not understanding the significance of an upside down US flag.
"According to the U.S. Flag Code, flying the American flag inverted is legal, as a signal of dire distress in instances of extreme danger to life or property."
^ Considering the tone of yesterday's threads...
Previous_Floor t1_jbbgone wrote
Reply to Re: Racism in Federal Hill. by frog20-1
A lot of ageist comments in this thread.
And the bottom line is the flag was removed. Let it go.
Previous_Floor t1_jbb6uaq wrote
Reply to comment by JustSomeoneLikeYou in Re: Racism in Federal Hill. by frog20-1
>Was there any merit to the person that said they spoke to this guy and he was saying racist / bigoted things? There are people also claiming your father was threatening to shoot people? Is this just random people on Reddit telling lies?
I think so. Telling lies and trying to incite violence, IMO.
Edited to add: The person who made those statements has at least one post in a subreddit that "officially endorses the New Black Panther Party and the Black Hebrew Israelites".
Both of those groups have been classified as violent hate groups by the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Previous_Floor t1_jba37cb wrote
Reply to comment by NinjaSant4 in Bricks With Homophobic Anti-Leftist Messages Shatter Red Ink’s Windows by Alphabet_Mafia_69
The only legitimate reason to not contact the police is if they're criminals also.
Previous_Floor t1_jba2ewm wrote
Reply to comment by NinjaSant4 in Bricks With Homophobic Anti-Leftist Messages Shatter Red Ink’s Windows by Alphabet_Mafia_69
>If you think they would open an investigation into what is considered petty vandalism you've really got a fantasy view of the police.
The homophobic note attached to the brick puts it into hate crime territory, not just petty vandalism.
Previous_Floor t1_jb8gkth wrote
Reply to comment by Previous_Floor in East Bay Old Timers Question by RedditSkippy
Jade Tree matchbook: https://i.imgur.com/Qvy57id.jpg
Previous_Floor t1_jb8fnwa wrote
Reply to East Bay Old Timers Question by RedditSkippy
It was The Jade Tree...and it was awesome.
It was here: https://goo.gl/maps/DPAFsDs8bGYbzHeu8
Previous_Floor t1_jb7h257 wrote
Reply to comment by bpear in Room & Works Providence by StreetLightTown
Your friend sounds like an idiot. It's the ghetto.
Previous_Floor t1_jb74mdm wrote
Reply to Room & Works Providence by StreetLightTown
I don't know anything about the lofts, management, etc. But it is in a bad area.
Previous_Floor t1_jb2hcli wrote
Reply to comment by Klutzy_Background_56 in Monday/Tuesday date ideas by TheNewGrandHistorian
Go with a friend for buy one get one free. It looks bad on a date.
Previous_Floor t1_jbl8m3b wrote
Reply to comment by disctosser24 in Wanskuck/Elmhurst safe for walking by Secret_Yesterday7625
>Bad timing of this question with River Ave being in the news today for a kid stealing a car
It wasn't just a stolen car. It was a CARJACKING BY A 13 YEAR OLD!!
That's the kind of stuff that goes on in Wanskuck, OP.