ProvBroker
ProvBroker t1_iz1bft4 wrote
Reply to comment by myninerides in Fortnight is closing after 6 years by lestermagnum
Source?
ProvBroker t1_iyj87s6 wrote
Reply to Feb 2023 Move by execdad
I manage a couple of units downcity (one on Washington, one on Westminster) that you might be interested in. If you DM me we can exchange info and I can send you links/pics/walkthroughs
ProvBroker t1_iy9hp1x wrote
Reply to Tenants rights > pets by trtltnk17
If you didn’t agree to that in writing then it’s not something you are obliged to do.
ProvBroker t1_ixwgu3a wrote
Reply to comment by Status_Silver_5114 in Non-Political RI Gun Law Question by provendumb
Lol, no it’s not factually correct. Honestly commentary like what you are contributing betrays a complete ignorance of firearm construction and function.
I won’t berate you like the others, but this sort of know nothing commentary leaves pro gun-control legislators and proponents mouths all of the time, which only serves to make the folks who understand the subject matter uncomfortable about accepting the proposals, as it makes it clear the gun control people have absolutely no idea how the thing they are regulating even works.
It’s very important that we have thoughtful and nuanced regulation around the matter so that we can protect important constitutional rights while mitigating tragedies and violence involving deadly weaponry.
ProvBroker t1_ixvznhc wrote
Reply to comment by Status_Silver_5114 in Non-Political RI Gun Law Question by provendumb
The gun will still be legal to own, it’s specifically the component that holds the ammunition and assists feeding it into the chamber (the magazine) that will be illegal.
ProvBroker t1_iturnvb wrote
Reply to Where can a 22 year old guy meet people around the same age in the city? by BluebirdPlastic3006
Name some interests will make it easier to help. The bar scene is very alive for the early 20’s crowd so those are easier recommendations to make
ProvBroker t1_isvtzag wrote
ProvBroker t1_iseu80p wrote
Reply to comment by Status_Silver_5114 in Ginger le Geis / Rose Seigel / "Providence Luxury Rentals" fraud? by mostly_moths
It’s completely legal to make an increase to the base rent amount for pets.
You can’t demand a refundable holding deposit above and beyond the one months periodic rent, which is why ‘pet deposits’ are illegal. There is only one exception to this one months periodic rent rule, and that is for furnished apartments that meet certain criteria.
Source: am expert
ProvBroker t1_is8eefr wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Providence announces new program to acquire vacant land to build affordable housing by rhodyjourno
It’s hit or miss, sometimes they love me, sometimes they hate me
ProvBroker t1_is825ln wrote
Reply to comment by close102 in Providence announces new program to acquire vacant land to build affordable housing by rhodyjourno
Any housing is better than no housing. Even luxury or mid-market builds will add to the existing housing supply. Increasing the number of available units is ultimately the only true remedy for a very real housing crisis. The issue deserves stating plainly: We do not have enough houses.
Any increase in supply is going to be meaningful here.
Larger developments will still produce “affordable” units at rates required by the municipality they are developing in.
I am mostly talking about folks who clearly have space for a duplex on their single family lot, or could add a floor and gain a unit or two.
ProvBroker t1_is7sw55 wrote
Reply to Providence announces new program to acquire vacant land to build affordable housing by rhodyjourno
Relax zoning standards and watch all of the housing pop up… Government programs are great and all, but they are hardly addressing the massive housing shortfall that we have here. RI municipalities need to allow more building density by right. Let property owners obtain their own financing to create these new units- The banks will gladly finance these new units privately if the local zoning permitted such development. Local landowners would see increases in property values and/or immediate utility because they will be able to generate income off of the additional units and/or provide space for their own friends and family.
Let people who already own property in the city build housing at their expense. All this program will end up doing is shuffling properties to narrow pools of private developers anyways.
ProvBroker t1_j1t46ei wrote
Reply to Help a circus aerialist touch down roots? by piranhaNurbutt
Budget?