PsecretPseudonym
PsecretPseudonym t1_j6o1kds wrote
Reply to comment by Aazadan in Facebook seeks to block $3.7 billion UK mass action over market dominance by davetowers646
Nope. Content-based targeting (e.g., AdWords, originally) doesn’t need to know anything about the user.
PsecretPseudonym t1_j5ub8bd wrote
Reply to comment by NinjaUnlikely6343 in Efficient way to tune a network by changing hyperparameters? by NinjaUnlikely6343
> “Didn't know you could use a portion of the dataset and expect approximately what you'd get with the whole set”
See: sampling
PsecretPseudonym t1_ir1gsb1 wrote
Reply to comment by Jojothewhale in Micron’s investing $100 billion to bring the country’s ‘largest semiconductor fabrication facility’ to New York by Avieshek
Once it’s up and running, I’d be surprised if there were as many typical factory jobs from this sort of work to form a union as some might expect. I get the impression semiconductor fabs are highly automated. It’s not like workers are laying down and connecting those transistors by hand.
PsecretPseudonym t1_j6pcdam wrote
Reply to comment by Aazadan in Facebook seeks to block $3.7 billion UK mass action over market dominance by davetowers646
Yes, “different type of targeting” means you can still do targeting. Just not user-specific targeting. In many situations contextual targeting is actually far more effective (e.g., search ads have performed incredibly well even prior to much use of personal user info/history, because keywords searched at the time of search represent by far the most valuable piece of information to select the highest expected value ad).