if that were true then there would never be offense, outrage, cancellation, legal action, criminal charges etc for the claimed wrong usage.

Judaism, Christianity, Islam, for example

yes because ad hominem rules all

I suspect a false dilemma so you would have to show a case in real life

religion gets ownership of they way they choose to use their own language. It can be part of ritual, and they don't have to participate in your religion.

It is. But even if you take that stance, it's contrary to the belief and practice of established religions well represented in the state.

I understand the use of pronouns over the last 5000 years and how it relates to belief and practice of represented religious groups

ah yes dumb (in your estimation) is protected by the NH Const

that's called a straw man.

This new use of existing pronouns as well as the invention of new pronouns is religious. Also note that it is contrary to the belief and practice of represented religions with 1000s of years of history (of those particular behaviors and beliefs).

the pronoun thing is the ritual of a religion. Not everyone belongs to that religion or chooses to participate. Other natural rights come into play as well. Freedom of speech, thought, religion.

pronouns (mentioned in comment above) etc is part of a religion. Not everyone wants to take part in your rituals.

maybe it has something to do with this-

NH Constitution, Bill of Rights, [Art.] 6. [Morality and Piety.] As morality and piety, rightly grounded on high principles, will give the best and greatest security to government, and will lay, in the hearts of men, the strongest obligations to due subjection; and as the knowledge of these is most likely to be propagated through a society, therefore, the several parishes, bodies, corporate, or religious societies shall at all times have the right of electing their own teachers, and of contracting with them for their support or maintenance, or both. But no person shall ever be compelled to pay towards the support of the schools of any sect or denomination. And every person, denomination or sect shall be equally under the protection of the law; and no subordination of any one sect, denomination or persuasion to another shall ever be established.

June 2, 1784

Amended 1968 to remove obsolete sectarian references.

What? You mean loitering isn't insurrection????

That terrible shock when you realize you are not superior

Some people need to lay off the KoolAid

LOL. -As if someone here claimed a whole state defunded the police.

>Atlest you admit it just a fairytail.

Yeah. Except that never happened. -So not only can't you see current events, you are seeing things that aren't real. That's an issue. Unless you want to get away from the mind control cult, I don't see much use in trying to give you helpful info.

If you believe it then you can live in a place that has abolished the police. I'm not going to. Enjoy.

Ironic (& personally I find it hilarious). If you spent any time outside of the echo chamber then you'd know what I'm talking about.

Rip Van Winkle slept for 2 decades so I guess you could have been asleep for 2 years

LOL.

Yeah. I think even the most liberal places that "Defund(ed) The Police" have given up on it now. Violent crime skyrocket. Who woulda thunk it?

1. You make it sound like the easiest job in the world. They're always hiring (can't find anyone to do the job). Sign up today. Show us all how it's done.
2. I don't know the specifics here. The 17 year old could have been a 6 foot, 200 lb + male. The police officer could have been 5 foot, 100 lb female. Identity politics hires gives everyone the good feelz, but then there are real life issues. It's one thing with a desk job, and another for this kind of work.. You hire someone sans ability to do the job and then they can't do their job.

exit hole larger than your fist. Looks like hamburger. Big, bloody mess.

I am now. Is there something you want to talk about?