the thing is that most companies thought like you that these language models were not ready yet, but chatGPT proved there already is a huge market for it as it is, so now everyone is panicked not to lose the train, no one wants to be the next Nokia or Microsoft mobile.

what is your definiton of understand?

what is inside internally matters little if the results are that it understands something. The example shown by OP and many more, including my own experience clearly shows understanding of many concepts and some capacity to quickly learn from interaction with users ( without needing to reconfigure nor retain the model) though still not as smart as an educated humans.

It seems to be a common misconception , even by people that work in machine learning to say these things don't know , or can't learn or are not intelligent, based on the fact they know the low level internals and just see the perceptions or matrix or whatever and say this is just variables with data, they are seeing the tree and missing the forest. Not knowing how that matrix or whatever manages to understand things or learn new things with the right input doent mean it doesn't happen. In fact the actual experts , the makers of these AI bots know these things understand and can learn, but also don't know why , but are actively researching.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/4axjnm/scientists-made-discovery-about-how-ai-actually-works?utm_source=reddit.com

>Man is still doing the learning and curating it's knowledge base.

didn't you learn to talk by seeing your parents? didn't you go years to school? needing someone to teach you doesn't mean you don't know what you learned.

exactly , I see many people , even machine learning specialist dismissing the possibility of chatGPT having intelligence of learning, even though a common half hour session with it can prove it does by any common sense definition.

The fact we don't know yet (and it's an active area of study) how a model trained with tons of data in a slow process can then quickly learn new stuff in a short session or know things it was never trained to, didn't mean it doesn't do it.

>Sure it isn't "really" intelligent but in some ways it may be intelligent the same way humans are.

what would be something "really intelligent" it certainly has some intelligence, it is not human intelligence, it is likely not as intelligent as a human yet ( seen myself in chatgpt use).

It is not conscious, ( as far as we know) but that doesn't keep it from being intelligent.

intelligence is not related to being conscious, it is a separate concept regarding being able to understand situations and look for solutions to certain problems.

in any case what would be an objective definition of intelligence for which we could say for certain chatGPT does not have it and a human does.? it must also be a definition based on its external behavior, not the ones I usually get about is internal construction, like it's just code or just statistics, I mean many human thought is also just statistics and pattern recognition.

the article is about chatGPt anyone that's used it even a little knows it is great at writing but very bad at math.

how is the top one supposed to work, bottom one works perfect for me but top one is wrong no matter what I try to do to make the images do, I can get them to match but the effect is wrong, I assume reversed probably.

in the probably near future using these AI chat apps to help on essays ( help, not blindly forwarding the first thing it sends you) will be as common as using calculators for math.

I think you haven't used chatGPT

>we already have this with things like Alexa and Google Assistant

chatGPT is several orders of magnitude better than google assistant,

yes! its unbelievable that I often have to do things on my android phone that are almost impossible on windows, like copying large amounts of files to and from a network, in windows I always get the dreaded errors due to long file names or not accepted characters, Android has no issues.

its a way to log in, instead of developing their own authentication system they use Google's, and you get to remember one less password

Newton, not sure if anyone comes when close, he made great advances in a bunch of foundational stuff:

optics calculus infinite series, calculation of pi gravitation

>Humans like to make a point which comes out in writing either explicitly or subtly. Not so with AI which is, from what I can tell, always “some people say X, other people say Y, so the important thing to know is that there is more than one way of looking at this.”

i am not sure if this is specific to AI or to current implementation of gptchat. it is obvious they have tried to make it sterile on purpose to avoid uncomfortable responses, and there are clearly some hardwired protections against some type of responses. they seem to want it to avoid showing creativity, anything that could make people think it is conscious or has ideas of its own or inventing new stuff( when pressed I have seen it does have some of that though still not at human level) , and then legal precautions on anything that would cause trouble if you base your actions on the AI's response.

do you have tips on what to spot?

I see it pretty good, it is kind of very verbose compared to a human, and there are easy to spot , probably hardwired, paragraphs about things it can't do or precautions to take with its responses.

but I haven't yet detected a specific with its grammar to detect it is ai , if I didn't know. neither in English nor Spanish.

they were called whatever, but the police didn't knock on their door, bor do they get punished by the government

an airport ? why would they go to an airport to look for local protesters?

> works well enough for rotating in space but doesn't help on a planet surface. I'm not sure how you think that would work under low gravity on a planet.

like literally every small amusement park has one around.

in a planet you make a horizontal ring and rotate it, it would generate a centrifugal (pseudo) force. you put the floor you would walk on perpendicular to the resultant of Mars gravity and centrifugal force. if you have 0.4 g then if you don't rotate you have 0.4g as minimum, in which case the floor is horizontal. the quicker you spin it the more total gs you have and the more slanted you make the floor ( with a limit of but never reaching 90 degrees for extreme accelerations.

as for the low gs, sure we don't have specific data, but we already know poodle survive over a year in 0g with only minor issues, and some of the issues are actuality issues that affect your return ( you are ok in 0g with muscle and bone loss) .

and dime of the issues are related to not having a " down" those inmediately disappear on Mars, since it has a clear " down"

moderately low gs are clearly and inbetween case so they will be likely not much of an issues for adults, since they can already survive in 0g.

we have little to no data on pregnancy and davenport in zero gravity and none in Mars g, so those could be an issues or not, we don't know. in pregnancies it is probably either pregnancies can't get to term due to the lack of a down vector, or no effect at all. the fetus is already floating in liquid so the lack of gravity is unlikely an issue until after birth.

a child growth would presumably be affected somehow by lower weight, kids might grow thinner, or taller, or weaker. sobre will have to see. again it seems these are issues that are more likely to hinder the martian born from traveling to earth more than their life there. but in the worst case you could solve if not with weights and exercises with the rotating habitat creating 1g.

>artificial gravity is still science fiction.

that is plain wrong, rotating habitats can produce the desired effect in space and low gravity planets.

it is expensive and needs to be very large for it to be practical , but it is possible with current technology

Mars has some gravity, and since we know people survive in zero gravity with some issues in the long term, it is likely Mars won't be a serious issue for adults.

might cause issues with children and maybe pregnancies, if really needed you could have a rotating ring in the surface of Mars so that pregnancy and most of commends critical growth happen close to 1g.