Call and explain housing situation . They will have a good idea of what to do next. Leave out the future job because unless it pans out, it's irrelevant.

No we dont

How'd they communicate this?

The way they wrote ..."[A]t best caustic" would be defined as in a sarcastic manner.

They basically just told us that the interactions are at best, sarcastic, and at worst malicious . Well, that's kinda a normal scale I'd say...

Nothing ,

No, that's what's around the area.....

if it's the lowest in your range and you inputted 1.5 of your last months kwh used, then I'd take it is there's no cancelation fee , then you can keep hopping if you want

papowerswitch.com, there really isn't a reason to go anywhere else

Oh, well then you will be sorely disappointed. Because PA power switch is actually a "Auction House"; or rather clearing house. Just because the rates are posted on PA power switch DOES NOT mean they have then posted on their own website. The info submitted to PA power switch is like, the Walmart of rates. They are encouraged to post good rates on there because they are required to advertise their rates ON PA power switch as part of their licensing. But they do NOT need to post those as a general person looking for a rate on their website. They are "Provider" deals lol

Well, it's not presented explicitly on the website, or the suppliers websites. But, they SOMETIMES have a higher incentive to cover the bigger portions of their wholesale purchases with the idea that, if offered lower rates, ABOVE average usage, normally equates to prompt payment because you are obviously using more than someone who is turning off the heat and may not be able to pay, and they need 6 of those types accounts at 700kwh to roughly equal what I do in 4,000kwh per month. so they can shave a few pennies off the cost to make sure that they have the recoupment of the purchase of power they are responsible for.

EDIT: From one of my service agreements.

Look at the scaling of price then look at the rate at top

EDIT 2:

• 4,000Kwh X 10.9¢ = 436$

• 4,000Kwh X .12608 = 504.32$

The extra cents add up the more you use, well it adds up to savings to constantly lower the rate dependent on your usage for a better cost savings for you

I have a scheduled date every 2 weeks to check rates. When I check I input - No cancelation fee- 4,000 Kwh monthly usage -Lowest to Highest Monthly Estimate. And deliberately look for longest term vs rate. Got shafted though this past month, My 18 month contract expired- .051¢pkw/h, and jumped to 0.102¢pkw/h as lowest I could find. Found some today though at 8¢ and 9¢ 🤷

switch to anything else, papowerswitch.com, filter for monthly lowest to highest, put your average kwh usage at around 1.5 of your last months and search. look for anything longer than 6 months .

Rates change again on June 1st.

Just switch providers before the end of term. What's your rate?

If found on PA power switch they atleast got a license to provide power

There goes the neighborhood.. literally

Mostly any comments section in /r/Pennsylvania is extremely wrong in 5 years from a neutral perspective. Filter for either "Oldest" or "Controversial" and you realize that it's apparent Pennsylvania is mind-boggling irrational in their opinions.

That's exactly what they are trying to prevent them from having to deal with . And sell the extra for and to a market that ALWAYS will need power. Data Centers

It's actually as an investment venture absolutely viable if bitcoin rising and lowering determine whether it's financially profitable. If you look at it in a narrow scope. Nuclear provided energy is exponentially more expensive on a output level than it is to other methods. The last 2 reactor nuclear power plant was built in the 1980. There has not been any or; rather, very minimal advancement in the area of nuclear derived power and its ability to capture "more" energy than was estimated to produce in the 1970's and then built without any "additional increases" in capabilities or capacity.

The cost of the more expensive energy, paired with PRIVATE electricity rates, that is not being used or paid for to any other company , except for them. They never "pay" for the energy directly , the nuclear radiation have half life's that could potentially be initially purchased and then not need a "refueling" for 30 years. And any "extra" can be sold -- DIRECTLY to companies who pay a HEFTY amount for "backup power".

And they can charge a arm and a leg because who else can provide 100% guaranteed sustained power even as a primary provider. And the "extra" power not sold; is paid for immediately by profits FROM the Miners they have powered. "infinite money" and they will be the first.

It's actually as an investment venture absolutely viable if bitcoin rising and lowering determine whether it's financially profitable. If you look at it in a narrow scope. Nuclear provided energy is exponentially more expensive on a output level than it is to other methods. The last 2 reactor nuclear power plant was built in the 1980. There has not been any or; rather, very minimal advancement in the area of nuclear derived power and its ability to capture "more" energy than was estimated to produce in the 1970's and then built without any "additional increases" in capabilities or capacity.

The cost of the more expensive energy, paired with PRIVATE electricity rates, that is not being used or paid for to any other company , except for them. They never "pay" for the energy directly , the nuclear radiation have half life's that could potentially be initially purchased and then not need a "refueling" for 30 years. And any "extra" can be sold -- DIRECTLY to companies who pay a HEFTY amount for "backup power".

And they can charge a arm and a leg because who else can provide 100% guaranteed sustained power even as a primary provider. And the "extra" power not sold; is paid for immediately by profits FROM the Miners they have powered. "infinite money" and they will be the first.

For context .. I agree with you.. sheesh

Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 39, Chapter 13, Part 2, is amended by adding the following as a new section:

(e) ( 1) If the surviving parent or guardian of the child brings a civil action against the defendant prior to the sentencing court ordering child maintenance payments as restitution and the surviving parent or guardian obtains a judgment in the civil suit, then no maintenance shall be ordered under this section.

(2) If the court orders the defendant to make child maintenance payments as restitution under this section and the surviving parent or guardian subsequently brings a civil action and obtains a judgment, then the child maintenance order shall be offset by the amount of the judgment awarded in the civil action.

Still not murder

Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 39, Chapter 13, Part 2, is amended by adding the following as a new section:

(e) ( 1) If the surviving parent or guardian of the child brings a civil action against the defendant prior to the sentencing court ordering child maintenance payments as restitution and the surviving parent or guardian obtains a judgment in the civil suit, then no maintenance shall be ordered under this section.

(2) If the court orders the defendant to make child maintenance payments as restitution under this section and the surviving parent or guardian subsequently brings a civil action and obtains a judgment, then the child maintenance order shall be offset by the amount of the judgment awarded in the civil action.

Welcome to my nightmare.

You're under the impression that child support actually is paid, and have no scope of the issues that arise just in FAMILY COURT, let alone if you are trying to traverse a criminal case into a family court situation because unless the law has set up a whole new legal administrative arm to deal with JUST THESE CASES, there would be no doubt that those families would never get paid.

Plus, I'm betting highly that insurance companies are going to drop coverage for payments on death benefits because that would be "double dipping" and screw the families out of civil judgment for wrongful death.. So.. It's probably understandable that you think equivalent child support is not unreasonable , because you only WANT it to not be unreasonable

That's exactly correct. Which is why it's irrelevant if you're hit by a loser and they can't pay anything , and it's irrelevant if you're hit by a rich person . No where else is your "standard of living" relative except for under this law, that has yet to be tested in court. You're irrelevant .Sadly

"[..] My kid doesn't deserve less because I died by some loser."

• There is no replacement for your income in any of the 49 states and district of Columbia aside from this law.

You're missing something I think.. If you contribute nothing (because anywhere else, you DESERVE nothing; according to the laws)to your minor kid, and you are killed Your child's standards of living aren't "perpetually reimbursed" with support payments .