ShalmaneserIII

ShalmaneserIII t1_isvet2u wrote

Myth might be a better term.

There are plenty of things that are useful for a society that aren't absolutely true- "All our citizens are equally important", or "We have a common purpose."

All these things are helpful since they distract from the frequently true statement, "We'd be better off if you guys were disenfranchised, enslaved, or dead."

3

ShalmaneserIII t1_is9iz9r wrote

The guy thought going online and encouraging people to kill themselves was a fine hobby.

People tend to marry those they agree with.

What are the odds she didn't think it was such a bad thing, either?

1

ShalmaneserIII t1_irzdm85 wrote

Not the worst idea. If you consider how much education it takes to be a trained doctor in charge of a few lives, how much harder is it to be making decisions for all the lives in your polity?

1

ShalmaneserIII t1_irxwmh3 wrote

You start to see the point of why Socrates and others debate how a society should operate- in no small part, to produce citizens who are not repugnant nor deserving of scorn from others.

It's not inconceivable that you could look around yourself in a crowd and go "these are good people- I am glad to be among them."

1

ShalmaneserIII t1_iqq6g3e wrote

For that to happen, everyone must be able to provide for themselves without the assistance of others- otherwise, you have some sort of duty to provide goods and services and ability to require them from others.

This goes to hell the moment someone wants to do more than subsistence farming, or when anyone breaks a leg.

22