Shelfrock77
Shelfrock77 t1_j11ba19 wrote
Reply to comment by MyCuteData in To all you well-read and informed futurologists here: what is the future of gaming? by Verificus
delusional. The WEF tells you to your face but your too fucking stupid to know what exponential growth is.
Shelfrock77 t1_j11b0iy wrote
Reply to comment by DarthBuzzard in To all you well-read and informed futurologists here: what is the future of gaming? by Verificus
Okay human, when do you think we will have all five senses ?
Shelfrock77 t1_j11aea1 wrote
Reply to comment by DarthBuzzard in To all you well-read and informed futurologists here: what is the future of gaming? by Verificus
“Mark Zuckerberg claims humanity will move into the metaverse in the future, leaving reality behind for a world of our own creation, that we completely control.”
“Meta plans to spend the next five to 10 years building an immersive virtual world, including scent, touch and sound to allow people to get lost in VR.”
And don’t try to say “bu- but da site isn’t credible” cause i’ve seen Mark talk about the metaverse shit like 20 times and he clearly states that it’ll become indistinguishable from reality. Elon has even said on the Babylon Bee podcast that neuralink would be able to let you play games online like in sword art online.
Shelfrock77 t1_j119zal wrote
Reply to comment by phriot in To all you well-read and informed futurologists here: what is the future of gaming? by Verificus
How do you know you’ve tasted things if you just said you can’t remember tasting it.
Shelfrock77 t1_j119sk5 wrote
Reply to comment by DarthBuzzard in To all you well-read and informed futurologists here: what is the future of gaming? by Verificus
I’m not watching this Gary Marcus clone. How far do you predict we will get an interet of senses ? I set my deadline by 2030.
Shelfrock77 t1_j1192on wrote
Reply to comment by DarthBuzzard in To all you well-read and informed futurologists here: what is the future of gaming? by Verificus
Ok
Shelfrock77 t1_j118lkg wrote
Reply to comment by DarthBuzzard in To all you well-read and informed futurologists here: what is the future of gaming? by Verificus
Idiot, listen. The metaverse won’t be mainstream until it incorporates all five senses.
Shelfrock77 t1_j117tga wrote
Reply to comment by phriot in To all you well-read and informed futurologists here: what is the future of gaming? by Verificus
I’ve ate plenty of things in my dreams. Recently I was eating wings lol. I’ve smelled smoke in my dreams cause my house was burning with fire. I’ve gone through wormholes in space. I usually have those wild dreams when I take weed tolerance breaks. My schizophrenic friend says he will sometimes taste or smell different things from time to time.
Shelfrock77 t1_j11791a wrote
Reply to comment by DarthBuzzard in To all you well-read and informed futurologists here: what is the future of gaming? by Verificus
You haven’t watched his interviews, even Meta’s president of global affairs Nick Clegg says “it’ll likely take 10-15 years before it’s investments fully pay off. To back this claim up a third time, Mark has also said the metaverse will be mainstream in 5-10 years.
Shelfrock77 t1_j10qcj7 wrote
Reply to comment by EnomLee in To all you well-read and informed futurologists here: what is the future of gaming? by Verificus
The Zuck
Shelfrock77 t1_j10pncd wrote
Reply to comment by ShowerGrapes in To all you well-read and informed futurologists here: what is the future of gaming? by Verificus
MZ says it’ll take “5-15 years” for VR to have all 5 senses. He details it as if it’s lucid dreaming online.
Shelfrock77 t1_j10pcr0 wrote
Reply to comment by Sashinii in To all you well-read and informed futurologists here: what is the future of gaming? by Verificus
We will basically unlock the gates to other multiverses in our minds. It’ll change the entire fabric of society as we know it.
Shelfrock77 OP t1_j1027uk wrote
The next breakthrough to take the AI world by storm might be 3D model generators. This week, OpenAI open sourced Point-E, a machine learning system that creates a 3D object given a text prompt. According to a paper published alongside the code base, Point-E can produce 3D models in one to two minutes on a single Nvidia V100 GPU.
Point-E doesn’t create 3D objects in the traditional sense. Rather, it generates point clouds, or discrete sets of data points in space that represent a 3D shape — hence the cheeky abbreviation. (The “E” in Point-E is short for “efficiency,” because it’s ostensibly faster than previous 3D object generation approaches.) Point clouds are easier to synthesize from a computational standpoint, but they don’t capture an object’s fine-grained shape or texture — a key limitation of Point-E currently.
To get around this limitation, the Point-E team trained an additional AI system to convert Point-E’s point clouds to meshes. (Meshes — the collections of vertices, edges and faces that define an object — are commonly used in 3D modeling and design.) But they note in the paper that the model can sometimes miss certain parts of objects, resulting in blocky or distorted shapes.
Image Credits: OpenAI
Outside of the mesh-generating model, which stands alone, Point-E consists of two models: a text-to-image model and an image-to-3D model. The text-to-image model, similar to generative art systems like OpenAI’s own DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion, was trained on labeled images to understand the associations between words and visual concepts. The image-to-3D model, on the other hand, was fed a set of images paired with 3D objects so that it learned to effectively translate between the two.
When given a text prompt — for example, “a 3D printable gear, a single gear 3 inches in diameter and half inch thick” — Point-E’s text-to-image model generates a synthetic rendered object that’s fed to the image-to-3D model, which then generates a point cloud.
After training the models on a dataset of “several million” 3D objects and associated metadata, Point-E could produce colored point clouds that frequently matched text prompts, the OpenAI researchers say. It’s not perfect — Point-E’s image-to-3D model sometimes fails to understand the image from the text-to-image model, resulting in a shape that doesn’t match the text prompt. Still, it’s orders of magnitude faster than the previous state-of-the-art — at least according to the OpenAI team.
Shelfrock77 t1_j0z19vj wrote
Reply to comment by Akimbo333 in Printing atom by atom: Lab explores nanoscale 3D printing by Dr_Singularity
You could also print yourself a new body unit to put your consciousness in or to have as a backup lol.
Shelfrock77 t1_j0uv9od wrote
Reply to comment by the-powl in Assuming we don’t destroy ourselves first, are humans headed towards a networked hive mind, Borg like civilization? by BizarreGlobal
I mean it in the sense that we all flow on energies, frequencies and vibrations.
Shelfrock77 t1_j0rzb3w wrote
Reply to Assuming we don’t destroy ourselves first, are humans headed towards a networked hive mind, Borg like civilization? by BizarreGlobal
After taking pychadelics, I realized we are all connected regardless.
Shelfrock77 t1_j0psmzc wrote
Censorship
Shelfrock77 t1_j061kee wrote
Reply to comment by PitifulNose in Why do so many people assume malevolent AI won’t be an issue until future AI controlled robots and drones come into play? What if malevolent AI has already been in play, covertly, via social media or other distributed/connected platforms? -if this post gets deleted by a bot, we might have the answer by Shaboda
“By 2030, you’ll own nothing and be happy in full dive virtual reality.”
The rapture is here to merge us with AI !
Shelfrock77 t1_j03ptv4 wrote
Reply to comment by cole_braell in Is it just me or does it feel like GPT-4 will basically be game over for the existing world order? by Practical-Mix-4332
And not to mention that’s for each gpt-4. That hive mind of gpt4 bots will make up super intelligence quite quickly.
Shelfrock77 t1_izw46wx wrote
Reply to comment by Accomplished_Diver86 in An Odious but Plausible Solution to the Alignment Problem. by OldWorldRevival
Your NN failed to recognized satire.
Shelfrock77 t1_izvzsln wrote
We need to align the AI’s outside of Earth too ! Every AI in every multiverse needs to be human aligned !
Shelfrock77 t1_izuvb2i wrote
Reply to comment by Rumianti6 in Just today someone posted a Twitter thread about Nuclear Fusion... by natepriv22
Ask the World Economci Forum about exponential progress. They literally talk about what they are going to do for the “4th industrial revolution” aka the singularity.
Shelfrock77 t1_izmrm1b wrote
Reply to ChatGPT and education by Practical-Mix-4332
Perfection is an eternal illusion.
Shelfrock77 t1_izhq3do wrote
Reply to Chat GPT down or overloaded or something? by mistfox69
The servers are down.
Shelfrock77 t1_j11bgbg wrote
Reply to comment by DarthBuzzard in To all you well-read and informed futurologists here: what is the future of gaming? by Verificus
When do you think we will get AGI ?