Shopped_For_Pleasure
Shopped_For_Pleasure t1_jax0j4n wrote
Reply to comment by andyrocks in [OC] Argentina & Venezuela Produce More Cheese Than Switzerland by latinometrics
Do you know what “state” means?
Do you know why we call them “United States” and not just “united provinces” or “united prefectures”?
Shopped_For_Pleasure t1_j9wlg69 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Well, at least 2022 was good to someone: Chief Executive Officer Steve Schwarzman took home a record $1.27 billion for 2022 by cannainform2
Sounds anti-Semitic to me 🧐
Shopped_For_Pleasure t1_j97bmaw wrote
Reply to comment by BigGreenBallOfPoop in Source: Griner back with Mercury on 1-year deal by sandleaz
“Hey! I hear that dope who smuggled drugs to Russia is playing for Phoenix. Wanna check it out?”
Shopped_For_Pleasure t1_j6cmfpz wrote
Reply to comment by masterile in AI will not replace software developers, It will just drastically reduce the number of them. by masterile
Because “reducing the need for software devs” literally means replacing them. Sure you’ll have a few remaining, but not a sizable amount.
Shopped_For_Pleasure t1_j5ox7t4 wrote
Reply to comment by the_first_brovenger in Report: Apple’s 2023 mixed reality headset to feature full-body FaceTime avatars and iOS-like interface by DarthBuzzard
Well mp3s weren’t cutting edge because walkmans existed before it.
And walkmans weren’t such a big deal, because we already had things like vinyl players.
And don’t even get me started on vinyl players. helloooo, phonographic cylindersss.
Shopped_For_Pleasure t1_iz4lhbe wrote
Reply to comment by HolyMolyManoly in Apple explores moving some iPad production to India, sources say by Thick-Ad-6366
No one thought this
Shopped_For_Pleasure t1_ixk5isx wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in City of Mesa reaches $8 million settlement with widow of Daniel Shaver by Clem_Doore
Like all losers he is an expat in the Philippines. Fits the bill.
Shopped_For_Pleasure t1_iu7ad40 wrote
Reply to comment by Proud_Tie in Down on chips, Toyota goes back to basics with car keys by Risay117
Ok, then buy it out.
Shopped_For_Pleasure t1_iu2d3md wrote
Reply to comment by LandoChronus in Down on chips, Toyota goes back to basics with car keys by Risay117
Youre paying for them once with a discount of not having them turn on, and a separate time to have them activated.
Alternatively you could outright buy it if thats your prerogative to “own what you buy”. Enjoy.
Shopped_For_Pleasure t1_iu0d3o6 wrote
Reply to comment by FeckThul in Down on chips, Toyota goes back to basics with car keys by Risay117
I’m not. I’m saying that it opens a new revenue stream that used to be in limbo of wanting but not needing the feature. It opens up the package to more consumers and is just a smart business decision.
Again, if you’d prefer not to subscribe you’re still more than welcome to purchase the feature outright — it just doesn’t make sense to 60% of BMW owners who own their cars for 5 years or less.
Shopped_For_Pleasure t1_itzzsc6 wrote
Reply to comment by Risay117 in Down on chips, Toyota goes back to basics with car keys by Risay117
Because the company needs to be profitable and standardized productions are cheaper than one-offs.
I agree with your sentiment but similarly the companies exist to make a profit.
Worst case scenario bimmertech will jailbreak you one.
Shopped_For_Pleasure t1_itzyd6s wrote
Reply to comment by jpsreddit85 in Down on chips, Toyota goes back to basics with car keys by Risay117
Again, you don’t have to subscribe and you still have the option of buying out.
And no, my math still stands for people who do not want to own their cars for 8 years. They would be saving $22 assuming they “only” own one for 7 years.
Shopped_For_Pleasure t1_itztw3j wrote
Reply to comment by jpsreddit85 in Down on chips, Toyota goes back to basics with car keys by Risay117
You realize you can like… unsubscribe to the features when you don’t want them anymore, right?
The seat price is a $400 option, but a subscription to the seat is $18 a month (these are real numbers btw). If your area is cold for 3 months a year, you would need to keep the car for 8 years for it not to be worth it to subscribe to the seats themselves.
Shopped_For_Pleasure t1_itzrbs7 wrote
Reply to comment by IcyChard4 in Down on chips, Toyota goes back to basics with car keys by Risay117
I don’t understand why people are so bothered by the option of subscription based seat heating.
If you live in a city that’s cold for maybe 1–3 months a year, why would you want to pay for the heaters in its entirety? You’re saving money by paying for a month or so of heaters. Similarly, you are able to “buy out” the feature. It’s not like they locked it entirely. If you have such a hard on for owning them in a conventional way, you’re still able to do just that.
The only people who are truly hurt by this is the segment of consumers obsessed with one-upping people with a similar model minus X feature.
Shopped_For_Pleasure t1_jblz0j0 wrote
Reply to comment by FantasmaNaranja in Where there's gender equality, people tend to live longer by LifeTableWithChairs
Because then you have to introduce government programmes.