SomeConstructionGuy
SomeConstructionGuy t1_iser79h wrote
Reply to comment by Moth4Moth in 20 Somethings Meetup by aej511
You guys want to all get drunk with our wives at home together?
SomeConstructionGuy t1_iri6pit wrote
Reply to comment by Thick_Piece in GMP powerwall customers…feedback? by slightlyrottensalmon
I think many manufactures are calling the low cutoff voltage 0% charge now. This lets them more easily communicate that the battery is at to 0% of capacity without the confusion of customers seeing a pack at 300v and wondering why it’s empty.
Edit: spelling
SomeConstructionGuy t1_irf3k1b wrote
Reply to comment by gmgvt in Richmond Vermont residents ‘gobsmacked’ after town employee lowers fluoride levels with no oversight by gradontripp
Spot on. We can all fight over the benefits of fluoridated water. But that’s not the issue. There should be no debate on weather an town employee will do their job and follow policy adopted by the town after a process.
SomeConstructionGuy t1_irb78fw wrote
Reply to comment by showmeyourbrisket in Richmond Vermont residents ‘gobsmacked’ after town employee lowers fluoride levels with no oversight by gradontripp
My mistake, I read test as taste!
But you’re still missing the point. The real issue is that one dude went a town adopted policy. He then controlled the flow of info and flat out lied to cover up what he was doing.
I’m not convinced fluoride is necessary or even overall beneficial, but Kendal chamberlain need to be fired. Anything short of termination is unacceptable and sets the wrong precedent for other town employees to follow.
SomeConstructionGuy t1_iraqjb4 wrote
Reply to comment by showmeyourbrisket in Richmond Vermont residents ‘gobsmacked’ after town employee lowers fluoride levels with no oversight by gradontripp
…. What?
SomeConstructionGuy t1_ir7wcfo wrote
Reply to comment by utilitarian_wanderer in Richmond Vermont residents ‘gobsmacked’ after town employee lowers fluoride levels with no oversight by gradontripp
Because he did it unilaterally with absolutely 0 input from anyone else. And then tried to cover his tracks by lying to the town manager about water test results.
SomeConstructionGuy t1_ir5df2p wrote
Reply to comment by Legitimate_Gap_3613 in rust prevention on older truck by Legitimate_Gap_3613
Extreme example, but this gives you an idea…
SomeConstructionGuy t1_ir5d9cm wrote
Reply to comment by Legitimate_Gap_3613 in rust prevention on older truck by Legitimate_Gap_3613
It just rattles and beats the hell out of it. Depending on the plow it’s 900lbs hung 4-5’ in-front of the front axle. And when you’re plowing and the edge catches something the plow will trip, but it still shakes the hell out of the whole truck. I’d guess I put more wear and tear on my truck in the 20-30 hours of plowing I do a winter than the 40k miles I drive. Plow trucks just take an absolute beating.
SomeConstructionGuy t1_ir5cgr0 wrote
Reply to comment by whaletacochamp in rust prevention on older truck by Legitimate_Gap_3613
Waxoyl hardwax holds up better to spray and rocks. Both are good, but the Waxoyl system is significantly more durable than fluidfilm.
SomeConstructionGuy t1_ir5c8m3 wrote
Reply to rust prevention on older truck by Legitimate_Gap_3613
If you have an immaculate 22 year old truck absolutely don’t put a plow on it. My 3 year old f350 just got 5500 in front end work and I only plow my own driveway and my job sites.
It will destroy it.
SomeConstructionGuy t1_ish3e3a wrote
Reply to comment by Apprehensive-Page-96 in 20 Somethings Meetup by aej511
All odd number wheels welcome