Surur
Surur t1_jcz9txw wrote
Reply to comment by Shiningc in The difference between AI and AGI by Shiningc
> Doesn't matter, they're just statistics and probabilities. It won't somehow evolve into general intelligence.
So you specifically don't think statistics and probabilities will allow
> an intelligence that is capable of doing any kind of intelligent tasks
Which task specifically do you think LLM cant do?
Surur t1_jcz6o4q wrote
Reply to comment by Shiningc in The difference between AI and AGI by Shiningc
> Except for human intelligence, which is clearly not static.
And you think this is the end of the line? With in-context learning already working?
> If you want to program it, then no.
That has been abandoned years ago.
Surur t1_jcyn9yy wrote
Reply to comment by Shiningc in The difference between AI and AGI by Shiningc
> It's static because it's just statistics and probabilities.
Just like anything else.
> My mother doesn't know anything about how human intelligence works.
Exactly. So clearly you can make an AGI without knowing how it works also.
Surur t1_jcyks6i wrote
Reply to The difference between AI and AGI by Shiningc
You write a definition and then you draw the wrong conclusion.
The main issue with LLM is that they are currently static (no continuous learning), though they do have in context learning, but otherwise they are pretty close to general intelligence. Current feed-forward LLM are not Turing complete, but once the loop gets closed they would be.
> Of course that an AGI could be created tomorrow, but first, we'll need to understand how the human intelligence works.
This is obviously not true, since your mother made you, and she knows nothing about AGI.
OpenAI publishes paper on the economic impact of GPT-4: Higher income workers most exposed
arxiv.orgSubmitted by Surur t3_11whznb in Futurology
Surur t1_jcs3gix wrote
Reply to comment by Zenquin in IVO Ltd. to Launch Quantum Drive Pure Electric Satellite Thruster into Orbit on SpaceX Transporter 8 with partner Rogue Space Systems by ComfortableIntern218
So that still does not sound very realistic, right?
Surur t1_jcm1k52 wrote
Reply to comment by Criticalhit_jk in Global fresh water demand will outstrip supply by 40% by 2030, say experts by filosoful
Maybe they are waiting for the crisis so a resolution can be forced.
Surur t1_jckuwdn wrote
Reply to comment by sabres_guy in Global fresh water demand will outstrip supply by 40% by 2030, say experts by filosoful
True. Look how ancient water "rights" is screwing the Colorado river right now.
Surur t1_jckcuog wrote
Reply to comment by BuddhaChrist_ideas in Global fresh water demand will outstrip supply by 40% by 2030, say experts by filosoful
I dont think we need radical changes, as the scope for better efficiency is so large e.g. simply switching to drip irrigation vs sprinklers saves 40%.
Surur t1_jcjwxtm wrote
If this graphic is true, it clearly shows agriculture, which uses 95% of the water, should be the main target, and even a 5% reduction in their use would double the amount of water available to cities and industry.
Why are we even talking about anything else?
Surur t1_jcjwbw5 wrote
Reply to comment by golden_arowana in Global fresh water demand will outstrip supply by 40% by 2030, say experts by filosoful
They don't use the same water.
Surur t1_jcjf89s wrote
Reply to comment by konaislandac in Skeptical yet uninformed. New to the scene. by TangyTesticles
It's the future, don't you know?
Surur t1_jchoerx wrote
Reply to comment by Floofyboy in Skeptical yet uninformed. New to the scene. by TangyTesticles
Can you read?
> So I’ve recently joined this subreddit, around the time chat gpt was released and first came into the public eye. .... I don’t really understand the scope of this AI and techno stuff going on.
The AI stuff refers to all AI stuff. FFS.
> you are free to disagree and think chatGPT is ASI
Again, are you on the spectrum? What makes you think ANYONE is talking about ChatGPT?
Surur t1_jchitcj wrote
Reply to comment by 94746382926 in Skeptical yet uninformed. New to the scene. by TangyTesticles
Stay in your lane, bucko.
Surur t1_jchbq31 wrote
Reply to comment by Floofyboy in Skeptical yet uninformed. New to the scene. by TangyTesticles
Firstly, you have no idea what will lead to ASI, and secondly, OP clearly talked about the future potential of AI to change the world.
You just decided some cold water needed to be thrown.
Surur t1_jch7vqc wrote
Reply to comment by Floofyboy in Skeptical yet uninformed. New to the scene. by TangyTesticles
You may be autistic since you are very concrete. Noone said anything about GPT-4.
Have you considered getting tested?
Surur t1_jcgygvz wrote
This is worth a watch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9Figerh89g
Creating a super-intelligence would be like making a god.
Surur t1_jcgrrtm wrote
Reply to comment by Stupid-Idiot-Balls in IVO Ltd. to Launch Quantum Drive Pure Electric Satellite Thruster into Orbit on SpaceX Transporter 8 with partner Rogue Space Systems by ComfortableIntern218
ChatGPT says 13 days.
Surur t1_jcgm3y4 wrote
Reply to comment by Stupid-Idiot-Balls in IVO Ltd. to Launch Quantum Drive Pure Electric Satellite Thruster into Orbit on SpaceX Transporter 8 with partner Rogue Space Systems by ComfortableIntern218
So how many days then?
Surur t1_jcfg3av wrote
Reply to comment by Vlad__the__Inhaler in Discussion: the goal of human existence should be avoiding the heat death of the universe by Mickeymousse1
Well, it could also rebound and end in another contraction via the Big Crunch.
Surur t1_jcejzu7 wrote
Reply to comment by Stupid-Idiot-Balls in IVO Ltd. to Launch Quantum Drive Pure Electric Satellite Thruster into Orbit on SpaceX Transporter 8 with partner Rogue Space Systems by ComfortableIntern218
Sure, but is it wrong?
Surur t1_jcbqtng wrote
Reply to IVO Ltd. to Launch Quantum Drive Pure Electric Satellite Thruster into Orbit on SpaceX Transporter 8 with partner Rogue Space Systems by ComfortableIntern218
So this is a reactionless drive, right? What's going on?
According to ChatGPT, a 100kg solar panel satellite with 1000w and 1 thruster could get to mars in little more than 1 day.
Does not sound realistic.
Surur t1_jc8olr7 wrote
Reply to comment by IntelligentBloop in What are some jobs that AI cannot take? by Draconic_Flame
Theory of mind meaning being able to see things from the perspective of others? They can already do that.
> Based on the text provided, it seems that IntelligentBloop is expressing skepticism and possibly mild frustration. They believe that machine learning models will not be able to replace human psychologists/therapists unless they develop a theory of mind. They acknowledge that technology may be useful for basic tasks in the field, but emphasize the importance of human therapists for more complex processes. Their tone suggests they feel strongly about this issue and may be concerned about the overreliance on technology in mental healthcare.
But don't worry, ChatGPT is there to make you feel better:
>what can you say to make him feel better
>>IntelligentBloop, I completely understand your concerns, and it's true that the human connection and empathy in therapy is something that can't be replicated by machines. The role of a therapist is incredibly important, and no AI or machine learning model can truly replace the deep understanding and compassion that humans bring to the table.
>>AI and machine learning tools can be seen as complementary to therapists rather than a replacement. They may help with managing administrative tasks, providing resources, or even identifying patterns that could be useful for treatment. Ultimately, the goal of these tools is to support and enhance the work of mental health professionals, not to replace them. Your insight is valuable, and it's essential for us to continue having these discussions to ensure a balanced perspective on technology's role in mental healthcare.
Surur t1_jc8ff0z wrote
Reply to comment by Draconic_Flame in What are some jobs that AI cannot take? by Draconic_Flame
Given that some therapy is done online these days, therapists are not safe.
Surur t1_jczczkh wrote
Reply to comment by Shiningc in The difference between AI and AGI by Shiningc
Specifically human intelligence yes, since that is how human neural networks work.