TacoNomad

TacoNomad t1_ivkbnv3 wrote

I agree with that. But one factor is, if there is a republican majority, lots of democrat led policy won't even make it to the governor. Who controls the legislature is definitely a factor in what laws are proposed. I like, at least, that Pennsylvania is a purple state and that there is potential for all voices to be heard. But having the majority control still does have impacts.

1

TacoNomad t1_ivk9xw5 wrote

Thanks. That's helpful. I'm reviewing the vetoed bills, I should have asked more directly, which vetoed bills you find important that he vetoed.

Looking at some of these, well, some are really odd, unnecessary or clearly in bad faith, so I'm thankful we have a sane governor looking out for us. I'm curious if there are any in particular that you you believe were vetoed in bad faith

6

TacoNomad t1_ivk8gmh wrote

He's not complaining about the war. He's complaining that the US voted in favor of ending terrorism in a foreign land and today there are people who are going to vote in favor of a terrorist, right here in the US, in the state of Pennsylvania.

He is asking how people can reconcile fighting terrorism elsewhere but support terrorism here in the US.

Let's not pick words and apply different meanings to what he said.

10

TacoNomad t1_ivk83po wrote

But what does this have to do with today's election in Pennsylvania? Joe Biden was not on my ballot? Why are we distracting from the candidates on Pennsylvania's ballots by talking about issues that are not currently relevant in this very moment? We can't unelect Biden today.

Let's keep the focus on the issues ghat we have control over. We can discuss your support or opposition for president in the 2024 election.

Mastriano is on the ballot today. And Mastriano is a major threat to democracy. And as a veteran, watching people support tyrannical leadership is scary as fuck. Because I have seen first hand the implications.

Let's not blame Biden for Mastrianos actions and goals.

4

TacoNomad t1_iv2g8qq wrote

So you don't even know what you're saying. You are just talking to talk. It's not my candidate.

You can't actually find a single opinion of my that fits your narrative of me. But you keep on. Why should someone care about your opinion if they kindly ask for it and you spew this rhetoric instead of answering.

Don't worry. He can't hold you down forever.

I apologize for incorrectly assuming you had an intelligent thought to share. Good riddance.

5

TacoNomad t1_iv1njo4 wrote

You're not even a good troll.

I think you have a feeling and you don't care about what exists in the world around you. How can I be upset about you insulting a billionaire if I literally agree with what you said. Do you see me praising oz or Oprah? Or do you see me saying that they will continue to take advantage of people? Because only the second is true.

What rhetoric am I spewing? That Oz will use his position to continue to take advantage of people? If you think I'm wrong on that, idgaf because it's true.

Please quote me where I said anything in support of oz or Mastriano. Go through as many pages of my post history as necessary. You're so high on your horse that you can't even read the words written. I'm not arguing any ideologies with you. I've only argued against the opinion of me that you are putting out there. Quote where I'm "punching left."

You give yourself all of those labels as if you believe that I am the complete opposite of whatever you believe is 'the right thing to be.'.

We've already addressed that you're willing to denigrate someone for being a woman. Or in your words, dick less. Because you know, women have never been discriminated against. What demographics do you think me and my family fall into? Because I'd hazard a guess that you have an image of me that is so far from reality that you wouldn't even see it if it smacked you across the face.

Again go ahead and quote the exact parts where I'm saying anything in opposition of progress. And tell me what demographic minority/majority labels you believe I am?

4

TacoNomad t1_iv1a4rb wrote

Why do you keep saying that like it means something? We're not even talking about libs or dems. We're talking about how shitty oz is. It's like you learned a phrase that you think sounds cool but you don't really understand the meaning or how to apply it, but you just keep saying it. Doesn't make you look smart.

You want to criticize me like you know me, but yet here you are, letting your boy Mastriano get away with treason because you think it's someone else's responsibility to handle it. Disgusting that you think it's ok to punch down on other people, that you pretend to agree with. We get enough of that with the racism from Republicans. It's 2022, time for our kids to not have to worry about being bullied for simple things like skin color and sexuality.

4

TacoNomad t1_iv0sb1h wrote

I'm not sure why you read my comment and believed my feelings were hurt. You keep making weird comments about shit we didn't even talk about. This is behavior we typically see from MAGAts that can't see out of their hoods.

Remember that this conversation is about how crooked politicians are. I'm really not sure what you want from me. It's like you're arguing against oz, but I'm also against oz (and Mastriano but that's not the topic of this thread) and somehow it's a problem for me to oppose them. It makes no sense. I have no idea how you feel that I'm defending capitalism by suggesting that politicians are corrupt and their millionaire/billionaire cronies stand to benefit from political-economic gain.

What is your actionable plan if ol Dougie starts rounding people up? What is it that you have planned out to do in resistance? Besides crying on the internet to people who agree that he's a disgusting racist fucking turd. Please share the plan so that everyone else can be prepared to take action.

5

TacoNomad t1_iv0m6ra wrote

Oh no. Stay focused, bud.

I'm only responding to the information you put out. You didn't argue that he was a shitty human being. You argued that she couldn't make money off of him. And to that point, I disagree. If he were to be successful in politics, she could easily collude with him to make money. Far more so than fetterman, I believe. Based on their history.

I apologize to you for being born without a penis. I know it's really upsetting to you that you don't have control over other people's anatomy. To be honest, I didn't have a choice in the matter either. That was decided for me before I was born. I will do my best to try to grow a dick, so that maybe then I'll be respected in society.

However, you're showing that having one does not make you intelligent, kind or a good human being; you're ready to rapidly insult someone you don't even know. And realistically, it seems we don't even really disagree with on this topic. But that doesn't stop you from doing your best to throw dumbass insults.

It's not a good look.

1

TacoNomad t1_iv0k1pr wrote

Please tell me you are smarter than that if you are voting next week. Quit acting like wealthy people stop making money off of their connections just because they get into politics.

In fact, politicians stand to make much much more money once in politics. The past 20 years of war are evidence of that.

Please be smarter than this.

−4