TheLamestUsername
TheLamestUsername t1_ixap3r5 wrote
Reply to comment by johndburger in Now he brings it up: Councilor worries ordinance requiring info on police surveillance technologies could mean release of 'classified' information year after he voted for it by EnjoyTheNonsense
I assume you mean BPD not BPS. But BPD officers do assist in investigations with the FBI, ATF, DEA and DHS where information is at the classified level. If you bar BPD from accessing classified information they would not be able to participate in such investigations. Additionally there are several other types of restricted information that she is not considering because frankly she is clueless.
TheLamestUsername t1_ixakhis wrote
Reply to comment by Yak_Rodeo in Now he brings it up: Councilor worries ordinance requiring info on police surveillance technologies could mean release of 'classified' information year after he voted for it by EnjoyTheNonsense
Well some of the examples you are giving (SSN, record, etc) would be considered sensitive. But you are correct in that they do handle classified information. For example an investigation by the FBI or other federal agency may be at a classified level, and those that involved (BPD detectives and task force members) have to have clearance. Some of the cameras used may be more covert and be part of such of an investigation. The notion that they do not have or should not have access to classified info is absolutely absurd.
To add there are other types of restricted info such as grand jury info which can only be disclosed to those involved in the case.
But yes in conclusion Kade Crockford is an idiot who uses illogical arguments.
TheLamestUsername t1_ix9uzzh wrote
Reply to comment by lifeisakoan in Looking for a romantic hotel room for anniversary by jason_sos
There still is one that has never been triggered.
TheLamestUsername t1_ix8u4jq wrote
Reply to comment by jason_sos in Looking for a romantic hotel room for anniversary by jason_sos
Oh no I was talking about the automated replies. 3 is not that impressive. Although getting the hot tub one was nice. Now if you got 5 or more then it would be special.
TheLamestUsername t1_ix8nzth wrote
Reply to comment by jason_sos in Looking for a romantic hotel room for anniversary by jason_sos
Gotta pump those numbers up. Those are rookie numbers.
TheLamestUsername t1_iubsu3m wrote
Reply to Wonderland Cannabis? by [deleted]
I like that they have a pic that is clearly taken in California.
TheLamestUsername t1_iu1b70s wrote
TheLamestUsername t1_iu1atfm wrote
Reply to comment by TheLamestUsername in Logic (?) Behind the Names of the Boston Police Precincts by sithteacher
Here is division 12 in south boston. It was closed and consolidated with Division 6
TheLamestUsername t1_iu18o2j wrote
Reply to comment by TheLamestUsername in Logic (?) Behind the Names of the Boston Police Precincts by sithteacher
TheLamestUsername t1_iu16y8y wrote
Reply to comment by TheLamestUsername in Logic (?) Behind the Names of the Boston Police Precincts by sithteacher
Here is an old list of divisions from an annual report done in 1953. 8, 5, & 12 are missing. Not sure if those were specialized facilities and not districts. Also, it looks like things got renumbered at some point. 2 & 3 are in Downtown areas rather than in Roxbury and Mattapan.
TheLamestUsername t1_iu15d7g wrote
Reply to comment by TheLamestUsername in Logic (?) Behind the Names of the Boston Police Precincts by sithteacher
Division 17 was in West Roxbury (not sure where)
TheLamestUsername t1_iu152n9 wrote
Reply to comment by TheLamestUsername in Logic (?) Behind the Names of the Boston Police Precincts by sithteacher
More on former Division 16 here
https://lostnewengland.com/2015/10/division-16-police-station-boston/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/941%E2%80%93955_Boylston_Street
closed in 1976. i would imagine it was a budget and need kind of thing. Probably a lot of the other stations that closed were closed for the same reason. No need to have as many as before.
TheLamestUsername t1_iu14k3p wrote
I can sort of explain it. But I have tried to find an old list of when the previous stations were closed and where they were, and have never found one.
So yes, those numbers that are missing are previous stations that closed. If you look at Dillon's at 955 Boylston, you will see it has Boston Police Division 16 inscribed there. I do not know where the other previous ones were, but that is a good example.
The letters are for the area of the city and figures into command structure
see also - https://bpdnews.com/districts
TheLamestUsername t1_iu0cee5 wrote
Reply to comment by BostonUniStudent in ‘A 24-hour neighborhood’: Wu outlines plans to bring downtown Boston back to life - The Boston Globe by TouchDownBurrito
Reader View is available for most articles
TheLamestUsername t1_iu00dfm wrote
Reply to comment by willzyx01 in New protected parking on Cambridge St? by wegry
Alright you heard them, we need two plastic dildos to help the cyclists.
TheLamestUsername t1_it071zv wrote
Reply to Yankee Swap Ideas by BillFederal6625
Whenever I do a yankee swap I get something from a local store that I want to stay around. Often I do a board game from Eureka in Brookline. I know this is not what you had in mind, but wanted to throw it out there.
TheLamestUsername t1_irg32de wrote
We continue to ask that you check if an item has been posted before. We also ask that you not change the title.
TheLamestUsername t1_ixaqcws wrote
Reply to Now he brings it up: Councilor worries ordinance requiring info on police surveillance technologies could mean release of 'classified' information year after he voted for it by EnjoyTheNonsense
While I was no fan of the idea of Boston hosting the 2024 Olympics, this is what Kade Crockford claimed would happen if we did host them. The fact that councilors pay her any mind is insane.