Think_Olive_1000
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j1cvpnz wrote
Reply to comment by oathbreakerkeeper in [R] Nonparametric Masked Language Modeling - MetaAi 2022 - NPM - 500x fewer parameters than GPT-3 while outperforming it on zero-shot tasks by Singularian2501
Chain of thought
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j17ndks wrote
Reply to comment by SendMePicsOfCat in Why do so many people assume that a sentient AI will have any goals, desires, or objectives outside of what it’s told to do? by SendMePicsOfCat
https://openai.com/blog/faulty-reward-functions/
First result I get when I google reinforcement learning short circuit.
Pretty well known issue breh
>The RL agent finds an isolated lagoon where it can turn in a large circle and repeatedly knock over three targets, timing its movement so as to always knock over the targets just as they repopulate. Despite repeatedly catching on fire, crashing into other boats, and going the wrong way on the track, our agent manages to achieve a higher score using this strategy than is possible by completing the course in the normal way. Our agent achieves a score on average 20 percent higher than that achieved by human players.
It's short circuiting its reward function. You'll be amazed how many words their are to describe something going faulty. Short circuit seemed appropriate and is appropriate to describe what's happening here.
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j16f2b9 wrote
Reply to Why do so many people assume that a sentient AI will have any goals, desires, or objectives outside of what it’s told to do? by SendMePicsOfCat
laughs in reinforcement learning short circuits
Think_Olive_1000 t1_izzv6xa wrote
Reply to comment by Loggt in Just today someone posted a Twitter thread about Nuclear Fusion... by natepriv22
Family guy ofc
Think_Olive_1000 t1_iz9wdls wrote
Reply to comment by MaddMax92 in What do you think of all the recent very vocal detractors of AI generated art? by razorbeamz
Next you'll be saying linear regression is plagiarism too
Think_Olive_1000 t1_iyr4e8f wrote
Think_Olive_1000 t1_iyr46h9 wrote
Reply to comment by TinyBurbz in Clip Studio gives up under pressure by Sieventer
Seethe
Think_Olive_1000 t1_iyr43x0 wrote
Reply to comment by Kinexity in Clip Studio gives up under pressure by Sieventer
Probably the best way of explaining your vision exactly how you want it is through skillfully drawing it yourself
Think_Olive_1000 t1_iyr3nj3 wrote
Reply to GPT3 is just Google Search with a fancy UI by [deleted]
I one hundered percent agree, it cannot be our way of getting to AGI or ASI or anything remotely that can reason intelligently. BUT It can and will be useful for a lot of applications though and in lots of ways it is more useful than Google because it can somewhat understand the context of what im talking about because i've used it to debug code the very code it itself generated merely through back and forth conversation with my local ide open to run the code. I only hope it becomes better at this companion type role because sometimes it kinda sucks even for that. I will be happy if we can get that far.
Think_Olive_1000 t1_ixyygg0 wrote
Reply to comment by Quealdlor in Sharing pornographic deepfakes to be illegal in England and Wales by Shelfrock77
Down boated
Think_Olive_1000 t1_ixmmga9 wrote
Reply to comment by MrAcurite in [D] Schmidhuber: LeCun's "5 best ideas 2012-22” are mostly from my lab, and older by RobbinDeBank
Not from a more recent paper
Think_Olive_1000 t1_ixmm3a2 wrote
Reply to comment by Oceanboi in [D] Transfer Learning of Image Trained Network in Audio Domain by Oceanboi
Yes, but how well it works will be limited by whether you can find exploit a similarity between the tasks.
Tangentially related: when openai were training their speech recognition model 'whisper' they found that when they trained the model to perform translation it also inexplicably increased the models performance in plain english transcription.
Think_Olive_1000 t1_ix9a243 wrote
Think_Olive_1000 t1_ix4qo3y wrote
Reply to comment by cyborgsnowflake in [D] David Ha/@hardmaru of Stability AI is liking all of Elon Musk's tweets by datasciencepro
Immoral things don't have to be novel for us to write about it but in this case I actually don't gaf what Elon or Twitter do
Think_Olive_1000 t1_iwwf1w9 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Why Meta’s latest large language model survived only three days online by nick7566
All the people sitting around singing kumbaya aren't building anything but mud huts unfortunately. The chads and jocks are too busy shaking us for lunch money while stealing our b*itches and the philospher is busy navel gazing. Imagine lumping people together like you're still in highschool.
Think_Olive_1000 t1_iv0c2eb wrote
Reply to comment by vedrano- in [R] Keras image classification high loss by mikef0x
Can it also mean learning rate is too small because it could be trapped in a local minima?
Think_Olive_1000 t1_iuxqe78 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in BMW & Its Robots Are Going To Take Your Forklift Cert Away. Good Luck Having A Date Again, Ever. by Gari_305
They call him the pick up artist because he picks them up artistically
Think_Olive_1000 t1_iuhgh6a wrote
Reply to comment by KimmiG1 in Experts: 90% of Online Content Will Be AI-Generated by 2026 by PrivateLudo
Maybe with dreambooth you can teach it through textual inversion?
Think_Olive_1000 t1_iu5k8ed wrote
Reply to If you were performing a Turing test to a super advanced AI, which kind of conversations or questions would you try to know if you are chatting with a human or an AI? by Roubbes
Why does yo momma smell like beans
Think_Olive_1000 t1_itfnpfs wrote
Reply to comment by CyberDaPlayer1337 in AI art 256x faster by Ezekiel_W
I doubt they want their actual friends replaced is my point.
Think_Olive_1000 t1_is6emyx wrote
Reply to comment by Mortal-Region in Why does everyone assume that AI will be conscious? by Rumianti6
Xkcd 505
Think_Olive_1000 t1_is6elhj wrote
Reply to comment by Neburtron in Why does everyone assume that AI will be conscious? by Rumianti6
Xkcd 505
Think_Olive_1000 t1_is6e8p7 wrote
Reply to comment by HeinrichTheWolf_17 in Why does everyone assume that AI will be conscious? by Rumianti6
You can arrange rocks on a beach to have Turing completeness it doesn't mean that you moving them around will ever make them sentient. Sure the rocks can arbitrarily compute but they never form a cohesive experiencing machine or something that can simulate a reality of any kind on. When you move bits around inside a pc it's exactly the same.
Think_Olive_1000 t1_irtjoc7 wrote
Reply to comment by visarga in AI art 256x faster by Ezekiel_W
i dont see why it couldnt scale? theyre doing a like for like comparison of the speed up compared to past models' speed with 64x64 image generation
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j1gew0w wrote
Reply to comment by calbhollo in Ethical AI tools will only hasten the singularity, not slow it down. by OldWorldRevival
IP is a tool oh the Corp class. Fuck IP in every form