ThrowawayAntelopes
ThrowawayAntelopes t1_iyan44w wrote
Reply to comment by Antique-Zucchini3250 in No criminal charges for owner of pit bull that killed 88 year old woman by AphidGenocide
It's a matter of risk. Sure, there's some distant possible world where she hurts somebody. But there's also a distant possible world where my 17 year old son attacks someone in the park. Does this miniscule risk mean I should keep my teenager on a leash in public? Of course not. You guys are just not thinking clearly about the role of risk in public life. There is functionally no risk of my dog, or my teenager, attacking someone in the park. That's sufficient to have them off leash.
ThrowawayAntelopes t1_iy6bita wrote
Reply to comment by icecreamfist in No criminal charges for owner of pit bull that killed 88 year old woman by AphidGenocide
In that case, sounds like we're in perfect agreement.
ThrowawayAntelopes t1_iy6arty wrote
Reply to comment by MalibuFatz in No criminal charges for owner of pit bull that killed 88 year old woman by AphidGenocide
You didn't say anything that I disagreed with so what are you even trying to do
ThrowawayAntelopes t1_iy6a49c wrote
Reply to comment by icecreamfist in No criminal charges for owner of pit bull that killed 88 year old woman by AphidGenocide
No really, tell me, do you think a 100 foot leash would have saved this elderly woman? Or are you not an idiot?
ThrowawayAntelopes t1_iy69r6o wrote
Reply to comment by icecreamfist in No criminal charges for owner of pit bull that killed 88 year old woman by AphidGenocide
Lmao what? You ran into a lot of dogs that were not under control and therefore there are no dogs that can be kept under control? And it follows from the fact that dogs are animals that it doesn't substantially diminish their quality of life to be on a leash all the time? You're drawing absurd over-generalizations. I've had a lot of owners say the same thing to me, and they were all idiots that didn't know how to control their dog properly.
It's also pretty stupid to think that a 100ft leash is going to prevent a dog attack. If a dog can't be trusted in public off leash then they can't be trusted in public on a 100ft leash. There's no way you can actually react fast enough and with enough force to pull a dog back 100ft when an incident starts. But using a leash like this is logistically out of the question for so many reasons, it would wrap around everything and probably be more of a safety hazard (tripping, etc.) than just having a dog off-leash. Especially in the woods and in the river. A leash like that only makes sense if you're just trying to keep a dog from running away.
Anyway, I will always prioritize my dog's well-being over the precious and puritanical feelings of paranoids. (And there is no possible world where she meets her exercise and stimulation needs sniffing things on lead all day.)
ThrowawayAntelopes t1_iy662xi wrote
Reply to comment by icecreamfist in No criminal charges for owner of pit bull that killed 88 year old woman by AphidGenocide
I share the frustration with the many many many people who let their completely uncontrollable dogs off leash. But it's just not reasonable to never allow dogs to be off leash in public if they're trained well. If you're not hurting anyone you're not hurting anyone. Why doesn't the quality of life of the dogs enter into the equation at any point? They're supposed to never leave their yard unless they're tied to a rope all the time? Ridiculous and cruel.
My dog is off leash all the time and I never ever have had her run up to other people or dogs because she is actually trained (plus an ecollar back-up just in case). She doesn't get stressed about it, she just knows to ignore others. The real problem is that people are totally clueless about how to train and take care of their dogs. Plus they get breeds they cannot handle, especially pit bulls. I still instinctually don't trust off-leash pit bulls because they've run up to us and attacked my dog so many times.
Edit: yall are such hiveminded retards lol. The downvote button isn't for disagreement
ThrowawayAntelopes t1_iycthc7 wrote
Reply to Psychological richness is 1 of 3 primary components of a good life, along with eudaimonia (meaning) and hedonia (pleasure). A psychologically rich life has varied experiences and perspective-changing moments that make life interesting. by Iaskquesti0ns
It's really a stretch to translate eudaimonia as "meaning"