TonyzTone

TonyzTone t1_j664883 wrote

It's not veto power. The Council has overruled a member's preference before.

It's an understanding among the CM's that they don't know your district well enough so, they defer to your lead. This happens in any organization all the time. One silo might opine on something but ultimately defer on the silo that knows the issue most intimately.

2

TonyzTone t1_j64vvsi wrote

>gives individual wackos too much power

Actually, our elections did that.

Member deference might compound the issue but the tradition exists because the city is very large and each member understands that they might not know what's best for a district across the city. Council districts aren't very large so each member should know their district intimately. And some do.

What might be a huge neighborhood issue might not even register on the city's priority list. That's exactly why having a chief neighborhood advocate in the council is so important.

KRJ just massively fucked up here. I don't quite get her thinking, and yes, it's also rippled into a broader city-wide problem.

9

TonyzTone t1_j30ri0m wrote

We started banning this shit back when the only recreation available to most folks was books, rolling a wheel down a hill, and if you had some money maybe the one play your town had.

Casinos and other gambling halls were the form of entertainment but they also sapped your money since they were addicting.

Nowadays, we have other options that should hopefully distract you just enough to prevent you from spending your rent payment on dice.

Then again, we have things like Candy Crush and EA games sapping our dollars in much of the same way that slots and pinball used to do 100 years ago.

6

TonyzTone t1_j2csr1i wrote

Suozzi probably didn’t run much oppo research. He was an incumbent, with amazing name recognition, in a district that favored him, in a period of time that favored Democrats.

This time more research was done and it was being sent out in press releases since August m.

Also, it’s not the DNC that focuses on Congressional races. It’s the DCCC (they had a detailed memo on him in August). And “NY DNC” doesn’t make sense.

2

TonyzTone t1_j2cshth wrote

You couldn’t be more off base. His opponent was raising flags but no one cared. The DCCC, which runs Congressional campaigns (not the NY Dems) had put out a press release in August.

This was all being talked about but you didn’t see a single article about it because the journalists dropped the ball.

5

TonyzTone t1_izl46rd wrote

It’s not the same group of adults. It’s hundreds of different groups all vying for very limited space.

Adults have a right to public park space, too. And most of those adult leagues pay permit fees which (partially) cover maintenance.

Now, invading a children’s playground to play a sport you can play literally anywhere is stupid.

30

TonyzTone t1_izl33ys wrote

We desperately need more park space. I play intramural sports like softball and soccer but I also love my pick up games. Except they have become harder and harder to find as everything is a pay-to-play set up.

What’s worse are the adults who don’t even put together a league and charge $10 because they hold the permit. Like dude, the permit costs $10 total and you gave 20 guys playing. You’re not providing anything we wouldn’t have without you.

28

TonyzTone t1_iz2okft wrote

I’m not a fan of this but he (1) didn’t get any committee and (2) he’s gotten pretty shafted in redistricting. He’s making a basic calculation that caucusing as a Democrat isn’t helping him at all.

Either he stays a Dem and runs against Brennan in the primary, or runs as a Rep and maybe stands a chance.

He’s a sitting Council Member; he’ll still have discretionary funds.

7