Trapptor
Trapptor t1_iwx1ff1 wrote
Reply to comment by S-Vagus in TIL in response to infamously high suicide rates at Mapo Bridge in Seoul, South Korea, the bridge was adorned with suicide prevention messages and uplifting photos. These measures weren't enacted by the government, however, instead the entire project was financed by Samsung's life insurance division by evilclownattack
See above comment
Trapptor t1_iwx03tp wrote
Reply to comment by S-Vagus in TIL in response to infamously high suicide rates at Mapo Bridge in Seoul, South Korea, the bridge was adorned with suicide prevention messages and uplifting photos. These measures weren't enacted by the government, however, instead the entire project was financed by Samsung's life insurance division by evilclownattack
You’re so close to passing the Turing test, but the lack of comprehension isn’t quite hidden by the appeal to absurdity.
Trapptor t1_iwwyklm wrote
Reply to comment by S-Vagus in TIL in response to infamously high suicide rates at Mapo Bridge in Seoul, South Korea, the bridge was adorned with suicide prevention messages and uplifting photos. These measures weren't enacted by the government, however, instead the entire project was financed by Samsung's life insurance division by evilclownattack
OK.
Would you consider the fact that you “don’t recall ever needing a ruler to give a fuck about [you] OR that anyone other than [yourself] has to care about [your] money” a privilege, or do you actually think that the entirety of humanity has that luxury?
Trapptor t1_iwwl2af wrote
Reply to comment by S-Vagus in TIL in response to infamously high suicide rates at Mapo Bridge in Seoul, South Korea, the bridge was adorned with suicide prevention messages and uplifting photos. These measures weren't enacted by the government, however, instead the entire project was financed by Samsung's life insurance division by evilclownattack
Would you consider this a privilege, or do you actually think that the entirety of humanity has that luxury?
Trapptor t1_jebqtmw wrote
Reply to comment by camelzigzag in We’re Washington Post journalists who spent the past months investigating how the AR-15 became a symbol of the gun control debate, political identity and mass shootings. Ask us anything. by washingtonpost
If you think that that is a good argument against gun control, do you similarly think that “Taking away nuclear weapons will only leave criminals with nuclear weapons” is a good argument against prohibiting individuals from owning nuclear weapons?
Edit: the amount of downvotes this has gotten compared to the complete lack of serious responses is quite telling.