Twombls

Twombls t1_iw3euzp wrote

Nh is the type of state to have LIVE FREE OR DIE. As a motto and then refuse to even decriminalize weed.

Also a bunch of libritarians stormed a state run ski area and held it hostage because state business bad I guess?

13

Twombls t1_ivol33p wrote

Honestly what do you prefer? Dems, libs and progs are all people on the same side but have different political meaning.

I honestly wouldn't call all democrats liberals, some are conservative. Not all liberals are democrats either. Thats a specific political party.

−2

Twombls t1_ivok0nw wrote

Reply to comment by Cap1691 in Why Phil Scott again? by rufustphish

She's an activist that's never held office before. She has a bad reputation in the nonprofits industry for pulling random information out of her ass, taking credit for things she didn't do and weirdly attacking certain services. Shes burned bridges with a lot of the dems in VT.

I wouldn't really call her a good candidate. She was never going to win even with support.

If Vermont wants a dem to win we need a strong somewhat moderate dem that also vibes with the rural people in this state. Probably someone with experience in office. Vermonters like level-headed people that change things slowly.

8

Twombls t1_ivogtur wrote

Because hes a moderate. Vermont loves incumbents. And the opposition is a bad candidate that even most dems hate. Honestly anyone who supprised he won is living under a rock.

I came close to voting for Scott because Siegals reputation in the nonprofits circle is not great at all. She has weird vendettas against certain services.

9