WhenRobLoweRobsLowes
WhenRobLoweRobsLowes t1_j1pvtee wrote
Reply to When is the case that the main actor of the show gets the "and" credit billing? by [deleted]
It can be a contractual thing, particularly in ensembles, to set a particular actor off from the others as a way of drawing attention to them and giving them an air of prominence in the credits.
Examples: Thomas Gibson and Paget Brewster both, at different points, were given "...and" treatment during the run of Criminal Minds to establish their status as the unofficial leads. If I remember correctly, Tom Selleck gets the same treatment on Blue Bloods.
For special guest stars, you're thinking of "...with" billing.
WhenRobLoweRobsLowes t1_j1pun3s wrote
Reply to comment by WanyCaleb in Which series got better and better every time a new season got released? by uzaira6789
Genuinely interested to hear an explanation for this, because Season 1 was pretty much peak TV for a lot of people, myself included, and I fully believe it never recovered after the writers' strike.
WhenRobLoweRobsLowes t1_j1puhbu wrote
Reply to comment by venm081199 in Which series got better and better every time a new season got released? by uzaira6789
I'm going to politely disagree here. For a show that was pitched on the premise of being about Gordon and the street cops of Gotham before Batman, it pivoted hard to "Batman Begins Lite" pretty fast.
WhenRobLoweRobsLowes t1_j1publl wrote
Reply to comment by billythepub in Which series got better and better every time a new season got released? by uzaira6789
Exactly. Like many long-running shows, the main cast members became caricatures, just one-note jokes to keep the punchlines flowing. Joey is dumb, Monica is controlling, Chandler is awkward! Yay!
WhenRobLoweRobsLowes t1_j1flkkd wrote
Mine went up about triple this month. Older home, brick, not great insulation. Unfortunately, it's on par with February of this year, which was the coldest month of last winter.
Absolutely sucks, though. Christmas bonus is going right to the gas company.
WhenRobLoweRobsLowes t1_j1ebdg3 wrote
Reply to How are streamed shows’ success measured? by AvocadoChz
Short answer: no one knows.
Showrunners have expressed their displeasure, specifically with Netflix, because there is no concrete information. We get bits and pieces from interviews here and there, but none of it is consistent. Some have said viewings within 30 days, others have said viewings within 60 days. Still others have said viewings within 28 days. Neil Gaiman recently said he was told completion rate was a factor for "Sandman," while other showrunners have mentioned how many people start the show but abandon it, tracked even down to the minute that people bail out.
Whatever the case, it's a moving target. A popular show or film one week may not be considered the same the next. "6 Underground was deemed a hit and a sequel was in the works, until suddenly two months later both parts of that statement were untrue. No one knows what changed.
The showrunner on "The Babysitters Club" gave a great, insightful interview that explored how little they were given by Netflix, but hints at how much data Netflix has, which has led to some wild shit. She mentioned an exec told her that, for example, shows that feature X in the first Y minutes are more likely to be completed
Which is complete claptrap, but it shows that a) execs have access to a fuckton of info but b) they don't know what to do with it except to make very broad assumptions. All we really know is that they don't share it with anyone, including the people making content for them.
WhenRobLoweRobsLowes t1_j1dijgj wrote
As of last night, all this (gestures outside) is supposed to be wrapped up by 7. Keep an eye on the news or social media or whatever, but I'd bet on them staying open.
WhenRobLoweRobsLowes t1_iyd7093 wrote
Reply to comment by ffxivthrowaway03 in People give George R.R. Martin grief for the delay of "The Winds of Winter," but imagine trying to write a continuation of your series after HBO already wrote their own ending to it... by SAT0725
Great point. I was leaning on the "die before finished" angle, but you're absolutely right.
WhenRobLoweRobsLowes t1_iycv8wo wrote
Reply to comment by wisdommaster1 in People give George R.R. Martin grief for the delay of "The Winds of Winter," but imagine trying to write a continuation of your series after HBO already wrote their own ending to it... by SAT0725
Yeah, he's angling to be another Robert Jordan - dead before he's even close to done.
WhenRobLoweRobsLowes t1_iycv4yx wrote
Reply to People give George R.R. Martin grief for the delay of "The Winds of Winter," but imagine trying to write a continuation of your series after HBO already wrote their own ending to it... by SAT0725
Martin had years - literal years, over a decade - to finish the story how he intended.
The first three books in the series were published over the span of four years. If he had continued at that pace, the whole series would have been done well before the first season of the show dropped.
Even when the show first started in 2011, he could have finished the series well before the final season aired, and it could have been a more faithful adaptation of his intent.
He didn't. He has chosen to drag out the process. He has chosen to work on other projects, as is his right, but he had plenty of opportunities to get it done. He chose not to.
WhenRobLoweRobsLowes t1_iy9hdza wrote
It's fine. I was there the other day, no issues. Didn't even consider that it might have been unsafe.
WhenRobLoweRobsLowes t1_ix8k04m wrote
Reply to What should I do by pirro29
I feel like this is a side effect of "binging" shows. When you watch something week to week, you have a chance for some natural excitement to build up and give yourself a break if you didn't like a particular episode. Trying to power through so many episodes at once ends up feeling like a chore, no matter how much you like a show.
I'll often take a break from shows for a few days, or even weeks, when I start to feel things drag, and when I go back to them, I limit myself to one or two episodes at a time to keep from getting burned out again.
WhenRobLoweRobsLowes t1_iwuhtuu wrote
Single-male-driven action adventure (as in "solo," not "romantically unattached"). Typically procedural. This can take the form of spies, police, investigators, whatever. If the person is running or hiding from a much larger organization, or has some deep personal mystery to address, so much the better.
I grew up with shows like that, but the closest I've seen in recent years was "The Player" on NBC (gone too soon, RIP) and "Shadow" on Netflix. Before that, the first seasons of "Human Target" and "The Transporter" really nailed that vibe.
WhenRobLoweRobsLowes t1_iujy3yt wrote
Reply to comment by RedDurden_00 in ‘Stargirl’ Ending With Season 3 on The CW by MarvelsGrantMan136
It'll hold the title for the foreseeable future, given the modern content development cycles and the fact that very few new shows survive more than 5 years.
WhenRobLoweRobsLowes t1_iujxqfw wrote
Reply to comment by mikexmachina in ‘Stargirl’ Ending With Season 3 on The CW by MarvelsGrantMan136
The Flash went off the rails because the showrunner is terrible. The seasons were too long, yes, but made worse by the show being left in the hands of a terrible storyteller for three-plus seasons.
WhenRobLoweRobsLowes t1_iujxg5y wrote
Reply to comment by TamagotchiMasterRace in ‘Stargirl’ Ending With Season 3 on The CW by MarvelsGrantMan136
I don't watch regularly, but the pilot was amazing.
That moment where Clark gets the news about his mom... in that moment he's not Superman, he's just a man, scared and heartbroken, but with the ability to be home in seconds. Man, that just crushed me. So well done.
WhenRobLoweRobsLowes t1_iu0dotk wrote
Reply to The Lightbringer Saga by Brent Weeks is an amazing world and good story with a disappointing ending. by AnApexBread
I really liked the Night Angel trilogy (but felt it also went a little sideways at the end).
I started the Lightbringer books way back when they first started coming out, but I quit after the second book. I forget exactly what bit was (it's been ten years) but it might have something that broke the rules of the universe he'd established because it was convenient to the point he wanted to make. He may have resolved the plot hole later, but I was already done.
When I saw the series had expanded from three books, to four books, to five books, I didn't regret my decision to bail out earlier.
WhenRobLoweRobsLowes t1_iu082s7 wrote
Reply to Pittsburgh Airport auction: “Last year somebody bought a used fire truck for $17,000" by Josh_Abrams
Didn't see the date and got excited to go.
WhenRobLoweRobsLowes t1_iu07s9b wrote
Reply to comment by SaltyPO in Monroeville Kings is closed by CommonTruck
One closed a while ago. The one up by Target was a shocker (including to the people who worked there).
WhenRobLoweRobsLowes t1_iu07fa1 wrote
Reply to comment by IrrumaboMalum in Monroeville Kings is closed by CommonTruck
Theybused to have good burgers. I went to one in Nashville a few years ago and the quality had gone down a bit.
WhenRobLoweRobsLowes t1_itzbae2 wrote
I know some folks who work in this space, writing and publishing books under 60,000 words. They're fond of it, because they feel it is a streamlined experience for both the reader and the writer, akin to a Netflix style TV season of eight episodes.
I personally am not a fan. As a consumer, I don't care for being charged an exorbitant price for what amounts to half a novel, and I don't feel I'm getting enough from the investment of my time. I feel like I'm just getting into the story and then its over. I get that it's in part a market decision, because there are a lot of people with limited attention spans who can't get into a longer novel, so there is an audience for it, but it's not for me.
As a writer, I came up under the 90,000 word rule for novels. At 60,000 words (or less) it's a novella, an extended short story. I don't have a problem with that. Lots of old pulps and stories from the '60s were shorter, blunter, and amazing for it. They were also cheap as hell; no one was charging me 20 bucks for two hours worth of reading.
Part of the longer format is giving people their money's worth, but also taking some time to live in the world and explore. In keeping with the TV seasons analogy, it's having a chance to have an offbeat episode and learn something new about the characters.
WhenRobLoweRobsLowes t1_itrbx02 wrote
Reply to comment by sjsmac in Lee Child and Andrew Child on Discipline, Dread, and Writing Late at Night by zsreport
Woof. No, thanks.
WhenRobLoweRobsLowes t1_itr9rnm wrote
Reply to comment by sjsmac in Lee Child and Andrew Child on Discipline, Dread, and Writing Late at Night by zsreport
I bought the previous one out of my local bookstore's clearance section for a few bucks, but I haven't cracked it, because I couldn't even finish "The Sentinel." It was such a joke.
WhenRobLoweRobsLowes t1_itr2x5m wrote
Man, I used to wait in anticipation of the new Reacher books. I always had it in hand by the end of release day. I didn't even know this one was out today.
WhenRobLoweRobsLowes t1_j1z2c0h wrote
Reply to A lot of unaired TV pilots have surfaced today on Internet Archive by HRJafael
Man, this is wild. "Drew" might be worth a watch.
I was hoping "Exit Strategy" was on there (Ethan Hawke leads a CIA team that helps agents with blown covers escape bad scenarios) but no dice.