Wowzlul

Wowzlul t1_izyybug wrote

> The diatomaceous earth does wonders to help kill the next ones that get through.

I've done that too! Put it behind all the electrical panels and everything! And the damn things keep coming because the neighbors are just really nasty! Won't even put their garbage in the cans and keep trashing the backyard lol

1

Wowzlul t1_izyxr3x wrote

My cat is a fantastic mouser but will do nothing in the face of roaches. She sees them but just isn't interested.

I have to kill the roaches. And then there's inevitable placement of a bunch of bait in the nooks and crannies that follows, the purging of corrugated cardboard and placement of all food into plastic tupperware, the cleaning out of every nook in the cabinets, the sealing and re-sealing of trim cracks and plumbing holes...and inevitably another roach eventually shows up because the disgusting downstairs neighbors won't stop piling up literal garbage in their apartment.

If your neighbors don't give a shit about roaches well then you're just fucked.

Sorry just bitching.

2

Wowzlul t1_izyuxki wrote

Second this. I never have problems with mice or rats in my places. Friends who get cats have them clear up almost immediately. I know right away if mice are getting in because the little beast kills 'em, and I never find their droppings around.

If you get a cat that enjoys killing bugs as well then you've got it made.

2

Wowzlul t1_iz5ohey wrote

Modern reporting is a lot more vibes than facts. Takes an inordinate amount of effort to separate what the author is speculating/opining vs what he's reporting, which yes here is very little.

It would be more difficult but more intellectually honest to make the case that while mental illness and criminal behavior are positively correlated that's not sufficient to justify this policy choice. Dunno why the author is so strenuously avoiding doing that.

2

Wowzlul t1_iy9vzcm wrote

Things are pretty busy down there already. You'd need to tunnel quite deep, right? And I'm not sure that's as simple in Lower Manhattan as it was for SAS Phase 1 which was mostly solid rock. I know they're already worried about working in soft soil for SAS Phase 3/4. Lot of additional concerns about water intrusion, for one.

1

Wowzlul t1_iy8sglj wrote

> Things are only worth what people are willing to pay for them.

This is just not true. Some of history's greatest artists were commercial failures in their lifetimes, often living very hard lives, only popular after their deaths.

Of course nobody wants to be a financial failure in their own life and an artistic success after they die. They want both financial and artistic success while they're still alive.

I don't think that everyone should be entitled to a good living just because they want to make art - after all, most of it is going to be crap and peoples' talents are often better utilized elsewhere - but I'm just saying that I don't think someone is a fool or a bad artist just because they're struggling to stay out of poverty. It's hard to judge that kind of thing.

2