The most intetesting conclusion we can draw from this article is that our morals have a long way to go. This is one of the more sad articles posted on here. Anyone congratulating themselves on intentionally harming animals "for science" or happy that they found such interesting behavior while torturing something should be ashamed. You can't do good by being bad. If you can't look past animal testing, you have a dull mind and no place in science.
Can't wait for all the standard horrible arguments defending this (and assuming I'm not a scientist or somehow unaware of how most of them explain this to themselves) especially in light of the torrent of anti vegan pseudoscience posted to this sub lately.
YoeriValentin t1_iqze6kv wrote
Reply to A research finding in mice that gabapentin improved rehab compliance after spinal cord injury led scientists to a related, unexpected discovery: Injured mice that didn’t receive the drug & declined to exercise by themselves were willing to hop on the treadmill for a group rehab option. by memorialmonorail
The most intetesting conclusion we can draw from this article is that our morals have a long way to go. This is one of the more sad articles posted on here. Anyone congratulating themselves on intentionally harming animals "for science" or happy that they found such interesting behavior while torturing something should be ashamed. You can't do good by being bad. If you can't look past animal testing, you have a dull mind and no place in science.
Can't wait for all the standard horrible arguments defending this (and assuming I'm not a scientist or somehow unaware of how most of them explain this to themselves) especially in light of the torrent of anti vegan pseudoscience posted to this sub lately.