Zugzool

Zugzool t1_j8gkgzf wrote

Skipped around a bunch of it. She blathers for half an hour, but she can’t give details because of pending civil litigation.

TLDR: she’s super sorry, didn’t want to hurt anyone, and somehow didn’t realize she hit the guy (hence why she just cruised off).

18

Zugzool t1_iu2g8qy wrote

  1. You don’t have to fill in all sections, and can skip the BOE part.

  2. You pick three. The people in the brackets are different people but running with the same stance/policies.

  3. You can find articles elsewhere on Reddit. The very over-simplified version is that the schools are kinda meh but also super expensive to run (as a result of the state cutting back its funding). “Education Matters” candidates are backed by the teachers union and would attempt to prioritize quality of education. They are also the current group with control over the board. By comparison, “Change for Children” is backed by private individuals/developers, and is more focussed on trying to control costs (taxes went up a ton this year, which squeezes homeowners and indirectly filters down to higher rents). There are also unaffiliated candidates who have no real shot at winning. I encourage you to do your own research, but the main issue seems to boil down to the side you trust most to hit the correct balance on spending/quality.

4