_googlefanatic_
_googlefanatic_ t1_ixlmgyn wrote
Reply to comment by Ishana92 in If freezing tissue generally damages the cells, how are we able to freeze human eggs and embryos for birthing later? by badblackguy
But I don't understand , why does a few cells destroyed in a tissue affect the tissue , the cells can re divide , right? If not then why so ?
_googlefanatic_ t1_ixlmglt wrote
Reply to comment by Terr_ in If freezing tissue generally damages the cells, how are we able to freeze human eggs and embryos for birthing later? by badblackguy
But I don't understand , why does a few cells destroyed in a tissue affect the tissue , the cells can re divide , right? If not then why so ?
_googlefanatic_ t1_ixlmcka wrote
Reply to comment by Ishana92 in If freezing tissue generally damages the cells, how are we able to freeze human eggs and embryos for birthing later? by badblackguy
So you mean that If we lose 50% of individual cells , it doesn't matter as we can mitosise them. But if we lose 50% cells of a tissue , the tissue may stop working?
_googlefanatic_ t1_ixl4s5m wrote
Reply to comment by iayork in If freezing tissue generally damages the cells, how are we able to freeze human eggs and embryos for birthing later? by badblackguy
Why can tissues be not frozen and 'stored' ?
_googlefanatic_ t1_ixlu4ze wrote
Reply to comment by Terr_ in If freezing tissue generally damages the cells, how are we able to freeze human eggs and embryos for birthing later? by badblackguy
Got it , but It should be rare right ? Like when we damage the exact location ....