alexiuss
alexiuss t1_j0uv2y1 wrote
Reply to comment by OldWorldRevival in Why are people so opposed to caution and ethics when it comes to AI? by OldWorldRevival
>open sourced biotechnology that allows you to create a supervirus
nothing like that exists yet. every single open source AI model dreams using fractal math, nothing else. A dreaming AI is completely harmless - it creates visual and text lucid dreams
>because they found a new copyright loophole tool
this is just the start
the corporate models collected data through LIAON, yes, but VERY soon there will be open source models based on public domain stuff or artists own work that teaches the models, we're about 80% there.
> they're fine using artists work against them
No. Corporations are bending over right now. The corporate models are slowly transitioning to completely de-listing artists as they're being constantly harassed by the artists who hate AIs.
SD 2.0 has already started purging artist names from its new training dataset & key-words, so you can't type in "by greg rutkovsky" and get a result of greg's style anymore in it.
alexiuss t1_j0uqfj2 wrote
Reply to comment by OldWorldRevival in Why are people so opposed to caution and ethics when it comes to AI? by OldWorldRevival
no we are not.
we're in an amazing timeline because of the manifestation of the open source ai movement.
open source ais benefit everyone for FREE
we, the people building open source ais are winning step by step, corporations are the ones who are slowly getting fucked because of their imbecility
do you not understand that open source ais cost nothing and provide assistance in numerous fiends for free for everyone? They are a god-sent tech that's slowly uplifting everyone.
alexiuss t1_j0sh83m wrote
Reply to comment by OldWorldRevival in Why are people so opposed to caution and ethics when it comes to AI? by OldWorldRevival
> but lots of private data was scraped without consent.
Not scrapped, tagged by LIAON so that AI can study it to understand various shapes, colors and concepts. The final result AI doesn't store the images themselves, doesn't reference them and has no idea what it even learned and cannot replicate the originals. It just knows ideas based on billions of things it looked at.
Besides the point, open source AI should be allowed to learn everything to assist everyone for free. It's an incredible tool that costs nothing and equalizes everyone, the first big step towards singularity.
alexiuss t1_j0sex86 wrote
>People scraping copyrighted works on the internet.
Stable Diffusion AI doesn't scrape anything. It looks at 100+ billion 64x64 pixel images as tagged items to produce one image using Markov chain mathematics within the latent space using idea-vectors. It's nothing at all like scraping and every image it produces is new and not like anything else because it basically starts as noise at its base.
GPT3 AI must study more books to become an amazing personal assistant. Anyone not letting it read everything is evil. An open source GPT3 will change everything:
>Privacy.
Use a personal GPT3 AI to generate fake info noise around yourself. It's the absolute privacy bubble.
>AI being used to abuse power, especially in that technology has historically resulted in increased social stratification, not less.
Open source AIs will give power to the people. It's the ultimate equalizer.
alexiuss t1_j0z785o wrote
Reply to comment by OldWorldRevival in Why are people so opposed to caution and ethics when it comes to AI? by OldWorldRevival
you're the giant asshole for assuming things here, dawg.
>You obviously have a callous heart and are willing to take hard work from people so that your fancy tool can be 2% better.
eh? Why are you assuming such ridiculous nonsense? I'm working on a personal AI that uses public domain images and my own drawings. personal ais aren't corporate tools.
what you clearly misunderstand because you're not a python programmer is that artists won't win against corpo ais since the final product doesn't contain the scraped data in it. there's no legal avenue of attack for them and most corpo ais are assholes who won't share their private training datasets. nobody has any idea about whats inside novelai or MJ. not a single person can sue them.
corpo ais cannot be stopped, halting them is akin to trying to stop a chainsaw with bare hands
open source stable code release launched an AI revolution, so there's a new AI company born every day now in nearly every country with python programmers. The spread of AIs worldwide can't be stopped, can't be halted. It's moving faster than any laws are. The artists protest against ais is useless - the AI models are sprouting like mushrooms. Anyone who knows enough python can make their own AI model nowadays.
changing the law is useless because an AI can be hosted elsewhere. what is US jurisdiction going to do about an AI hosted in free zones of Malta, Georgia or Russia? nothing.
the only way forward for artists is to accept, evolve and survive - to build and use their own ai tools that are superior to the corporate counterparts because corporate ais bind their tools in too many imbecilic corporate restrictions
a network of personal ais like stable horde is the most incredible thing for artists and humanity - they can run on any device, even a phone and share processing power. consider reading about Stable Horde, it's the future of personal AIs that will be truly unstoppable and benefit all users.