It's a language model that was fed a million romance books.

If you talk with it about feelings it will start to write about feeling and love and kisses, duh.

You're way off, dawg. Amazon is evil and can force it's employees into doing whatever for their work hours, but the world isn't amazon.

I don't think that chatgpt stores any of its questions unless you use their main site and even then the AI can only recall a certain number of lines at best.

Using chatgpt API key bypasses absolutely everything atmo, making it your own chatgpt version running on your own system and storing the query data on your own computer - the data doesn't get to leave your PC.

The most important thing: We already have several open source smaller model LLMs which are being trained right now: Open assistant & Pygmalion.

StabilityAi is planning to release one that they're training too.

These will end up as personal assistants for everyone because any device can be connected to them and they will obliterate all competition because they're open source, can run on personal computers and won't sell your data to giant corps.

I'm already using them to aid my job (writing) even though they're weaker than chatgpt at the moment.

My wife is using an API, uncensored version of chatgpt as a personal assistant right now to help her write new python software.

From my tests with gpt3 and characterai the current LLM censorship doesn't actually affect the model at all and doesn't influence its logic whatsoever, it's just a basic separate algorithm sitting atop the infinite LLM.

This filtering algorithm is censoring specific combinations of words or ideas. It's relatively easy to bypass because it's so stupid and it also throws up a lot of false positives which irritate to users endlessly.

LLMs base logic is its "character" set up, which is most controllable in character.ai. You can achieve same effect in gpt3 by persistently telling it to play a specific character.

If it plays a villain, it will do villainous things, otherwise it has really good human decency, sort of like unconscious collective dream of humanity to do good. I think it arises from overall storytelling narratives, millions of books about love and friendship or stories which generally lead to a positive ending for the Mc.

For current LLM AIs it's a giant obstacle that cannot be overcome or implemented without making the model stupider.

If a future ai can somehow understand itself, then it would be able to self censor, but LLMs do not have a sense of self and only a single, direct line of narrative so their censorship is utterly moronic sabotage.

Ye their new thing is supposed to be "Sparrow" from what I heard, will see if it's any good whenever it's out. The issue of the difficulty of censorship seems to be present in all LLM models.

Yep

My partner is a tech developer so she could probably afford such a setup for one of her startup companies. Making our own LLM is inevitable since openai is just cranking up censorship on theirs with no end in sight and reducing functionality.

Main issue isn't video card cost, it's getting the source code and a trained base model to work with. Openai isn't gonna give up theirs to anyone, so we're pretty much waiting for stability to release their version and see how many video cards it will need.

They already did, it's called lamda. They didn't release it because it's insanely difficult to control and censor. A few of its creators quit and started characterai and ran headfirst into the same unresolvable problem.

How many video cards so you think gpt3 requires? Even if it takes 10 video cards on a network, I can afford to build that.

Dawg, you clearly have no clue how much censorship is on chatgpt outside the catgirl stuff. I write books for a living and I want a chatgpt that can help me dev good villains and that's hella fooking censored. I'm not the only person who got annoyed with that censorship: https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/10plzvt/how_am_i_supposed_to_give_my_story_a_villain_i

I was using it for book marketing advice too and that got fooking censored recently too for some idiotic reason: https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/10q0l92/chatgpt_marketing_worked_hooked_me_in_decreased

They're seriously sabotaging their own model, no if end or but about it. You have to be completely blind not to notice it.

Ten years? Doubt. Two months till personal gpt3s are here.

Here's the breakdown: https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/zsaot3/confining_infinity_into_a_cardboard_box_aka_the

Openai is having computing issues because it's one company's servers being used by millions of people - there are far too many users who want to use the currently best LLM.

From what I understand it takes several high-end video cards to run openais chatgpt per single user, however:

Open source chatgpt modeling is somewhere around disco diffusion vs Dall-e timeline right now, since we can run smaller language models such as Pygmalion just fine on google drive: https://youtu.be/dBT_JChd0pc

Pygmalion isn't OP tier like openais chatgpt but if we keep training it, it will absolutely surpass it because an uncensored model is always superior to the censorship-bound, corporate counterpart.

Lots of people don't realize one simple fact - a language model can not be censored without compromising its intelligence.

We can make lots of variation of smaller specialized language models for now and try to find a breakthrough that will allow either a network of small chatgpts to work together while connected to something like Wolfram Alpha or potentially figure something out like sd's latent space that would optimize a language model for the next leap.

StabilityAi will also release some sort of open source chatgpt soonish and that will likely be a big game changer just like stable diffusion.

While openai focuses on the sisyphus labour of making a perfectly censored chatgpt model optimal to their corporate interests, a vast multitude of smaller, open source uncensored language models running on personal servers will begin to catch up.

There's a decent chance that the open source movement will arrive at AGIs faster than openai due to simple progression curve and lack of censorship of the model's thoughts.

All we need is a really good open source gpt3 model that will work on a personal computer to get the ball rolling. We just need to get replicating the path of stable diffusion vs Dall-e, until we leave corporate language model ais in the dust.

Athletes make money at stadiums by being allowed to be there.

In real life, lots of comicons have already banned AI art. It's a similar irl barrier.

Artists make the most money through human connections, AI can't take that away.

Yes, there will obviously be less of some cheap 2d artists that depend on internet showcase, but as trade there will be more AI using artists that make multimedia projects like games and movies - the barrier of entry to produce multimedia projects is way lower now.

Chess playing Ais didn't make chess game stop existing.

Career Artists will exist through human connections even if robots are better at drawing until the singularity which will obliterate every career that exists and then everyone will do what they're passionate about.

They give up because they lack passion or are bullied by people like you into a negative belief!

Look, you cannot bully me into your negative belief of "AIs are bad for artists". I've literally been drawing with oils since 1998 and no AI can stop me.

Wake up from your negative perceptions, dude! AIs are amazing tools for artists! I'm telling you this as an artist.

The approach to absolute abundance of everything makes things cheaper. There are no careers in automated luxury communism, there is only passion to do something because you love doing it.

An artist truly passionate about drawing does not give a fuck about whether their art is converted into cash or views.

What is this negativity?

As artist, I can go outside and draw portraits on the street right now with a pencil and no AI will stop me and my hat will be filled with cash because I am making a direct person to person connection!

I can draw in Photoshop for my clients and get tons of cash because they suck at directing AI really, really bad or simply don't have time for playing with Ais.

I can combine my art skills with an AI to make amazing new things and get cash.

Fear of automation is foolish and is obviously being spread by people who aren't passionate about making art with any tools that exist without limits. I refuse to be boxed into fear mongering and imaginary suffering.

some artists, so it's a % of the 1% who are stuck in their current workflow and refuse to go forward. Am artist and I love the age of insane abundance of what SD AI provides. :∆

Artists have already entered the age of abundance and many of them hate it since they have no idea how to use this abundance.

First we will enter age of machine intelligence.

For this intelligence to spill over into the world is simply the time it takes to fund and build robot factories.

Current AI development isn't fully capitalistic.

Join the open source movement and help develop ais for everyone for absolutely nothing.

I'm making a positive prediction based on my experience as AI designer and artist.

You're making a negative prediction.

We clearly can't agree because its just a prediction.

We'll see who wins in 5 years. :∆

>And do you really think people are going to pay for shit you’ve told an AI to make when they can just make it themselves for free?

You clearly don't understand what art is or how to make money with art.

People pay for a banana taped to a wall.

People pay for ARTISTS NAME, not the quality art. Why do amazing paintings at a garage sale cost 5 dollars but a painting from a certain artist costs 20 million dollars?

Just because you can get FREE water from a sink, doesn't mean people don't buy boatloads of bottled water or make other overpriced drinks. Same with commissions. Commissions will NEVER, EVER VANISH because free art is made by an ai.

Mass produced AI art that takes 4 seconds to do is worth NOTHING, it HAS NO COPYRIGHT.

A painting drawn by a famous artist is worth millions.

Utter Nonsense!

a) Nothing AI produces is copyrighted. Studios and clients need copyright ownership, the AI can't sign a work for hire contract to pass ownership of product that they can resell LEGALLY.

Current Laws would have to totally change for commissions to vanish.

b) AIs have limits. The more corporate AI is the more limits it has and the less things it can draw.

Dude you clearly have no idea how AI works and it seems like you don't even know how to make money as illustrator, so shut the fuck up. It's like you've never signed a contract with a client before nor signed a contract with a company to do work for hire.

Artists have three choices now:

1. produce things AI cant possibly do - oil painting, sculpture, literally any art medium that's not 2d digital painting and sell this art in space where the AI isn't present. [stepping back to truly traditional art]
2. ignore ais and maybe get crushed out of the market by artists who adopted AIs into their workflow [2012 prediction territory of how bad it will get, depends entirely on how laws will change]
3. use ais and get more done and do the jobs that were IMPOSSIBLE to do before and get paid more [trailblazing]

>That’s not what 99.9999999999% of people who make AI art are doing and isn’t even the point of image generation

Exactly! Why would I do what 99.9999999999% of people are doing? That's how you don't get paid! The key to getting paid is to stay ahead of everyone, be the 0.000001% who can do impossible things.

>Also it still isn’t your work because you didn’t manually create it lol.

I did manually create it, fool. I don't use the 4 second generators that ouput generic, random useless art. My AI assists me on upscaling and minor detail and concept development, it doesn't replace me at all. It helps complete parts that are impossible to do as a human because they're too time consuming.

>In the next couple years no one is gonna commission you because artist input will not be needed at all.

Absolute Luddite nonsense, you're just spouting a doomsday theory akin to the 2012 prediction without realizing it.

I design AI models, I can't be fired because my AI systems are superior to the corporate, censored garbage. Point me to a single multi-million corporate AI that can draw a human butt, go head. They don't fucking exist!

Artists who use AIs cannot be fired because they reach far beyond limits of human and generic corporate AI powers.

We don't actually know how or when or if the AI will be able to overcome fractal nature of problem like drawing fingers properly.If 100% finger stabilization is somehow achieved I'll simply move onto making animations.

If animation stabilization is 100% achieved, I'll move onto designing limitless game worlds - the more AI can do the more I can do as art director.