antiiltal
antiiltal t1_j28c97h wrote
Reply to comment by Head_Weakness8028 in If the Big Bang was the end of a previous universe, then could a strong enough telescope see into the previous universe? by [deleted]
What do you mean by the event horizon in the case of protons, electrons and neutrons?
antiiltal t1_j28asd7 wrote
Reply to comment by Texan4eva in If the Big Bang was the end of a previous universe, then could a strong enough telescope see into the previous universe? by [deleted]
Remember that it wont be just milky way then, but milky way - andromeda galaxy.
antiiltal t1_j28aizn wrote
Reply to comment by Inevitable-Ear-3189 in If the Big Bang was the end of a previous universe, then could a strong enough telescope see into the previous universe? by [deleted]
So is there a real alternative to Penrose explanation? I guess the current scientific empirical truth is just that everything started from the big bang and nothing was before that, because before that nothing cannot be confirmed empirically or mathematically. So they just leave it be.
antiiltal t1_j289xnc wrote
Reply to comment by The-Temple-Of-Iron in If the Big Bang was the end of a previous universe, then could a strong enough telescope see into the previous universe? by [deleted]
The hypothesis that a black hole was the big bang is not really supported. And of course it is insufficiant in itself, because the black hole had to come from somewhere.
antiiltal t1_j29qt8n wrote
Reply to comment by staroura in Before Newton, how did people explain falling apples? by maugustus
Well yes and even a little bit humoristically according to relativity there is no real gravitational force existing between objects. Mass is just bending and curvature of the spacetime. So the bigger object the more curvature on the fabric of spacetime and smaller objects fall in to them, because of the curvature. In the end Newton was actually wrong with gravitation.