anurodhp

anurodhp t1_iuiafnq wrote

as i said lets see what happens. if he is actually prosecuted and not let out on the street again i will concede that i was in correct, if you find that to be unreasonable or outrageous, you may be the one who needs to take a walk.

−9

anurodhp t1_iui3o6w wrote

you know what, we can speculate but in this case its pretty easy to see what happens. so lets see what happens. I know breaking and entring is actually on the do not prosecute list in your county. If he is even prosecuted, does bail fund show up? they haven not shied away from helping rapists get out and attack new people while on bail in the past.

−15

anurodhp t1_iublty3 wrote

Drives me nuts when people say this will give more money to something. If you read the question there is nothing in it that says funding will increase for school or transport just that this money will go to it. You may actually have a decrease in funding if revenues from this tax are insufficient and politicians allocate money that would have gone here to other projects

−22

anurodhp OP t1_isoh319 wrote

>Few tenants know that such software, owned by a privately held company, has had a hand in rent increases across the country.
In Boston, renter Kaylee Hutchinson said she was puzzled when her landlord—unbeknownst to her, a RealPage client—told her days into the first pandemic lockdowns that her rent was going up. Building staff insisted that the market rate for her apartment was 6.5% higher than she was paying, despite her protests that people were fleeing the city.

53