bittoxic00

bittoxic00 t1_je2aem1 wrote

If you plan on not staying and being evicted with a judgement along with an eviction on your record, by all means pocket that money and move on. If you hope to stay and would like to withhold money for reasons because of conditions that money has to be deposited in a separate account. They’re just setting themselves up for failure IMO

5

bittoxic00 t1_jdmg6h7 wrote

He means if you take away all the good kids then bad kids become a higher percentage of students and the problem is worse (more visible). He’s upset he’s not teaching geniuses like in the movies he watched as a kid that inspired him to become a teacher and now has a difficult work environment

2

bittoxic00 t1_jdka7xq wrote

So instead of holding someone back or getting them a more suited education the trick is to push them to the next grade onto a different teacher who now has to deal with both disruptions and retreading material wasting every other students time and then eventually dumping them on the world, uneducated and unprepared for all but the lowest prospects

0

bittoxic00 t1_jdk7tl5 wrote

I can play your game too. First off it’s, “you’re”. Secondly 200 means nothing giving your class could be 201 or 3000. Each class of graduates advancing would be treated independently given an entering class unaltered from a previous year would displace a graduating class. We can debate but if you’re being mean spirited just go join the George santos re-election committee

0

bittoxic00 t1_jdia283 wrote

I grew up in the public school system, there were problem kids that really affected classes. The only way past it was moving to another district. These children will still be taught but I just don’t understand why some children can’t flourish in nyc without leaving their neighborhood or shelling out 50k for a private education

2