bookers555

bookers555 t1_j1kte16 wrote

I don't think the Big Bounce theory says anything about the universes being the exact same. Just that a universe is born, grows, eventually collapses, and then a new one is born again.

Closest I can think of is the multi-verse theory. Like there's a universe where your life is the exact same, but instead of making this post you went to take a piss instead.

1

bookers555 t1_j1btlmr wrote

>I always thought this was a bad idea because I pictured microwaves blasting down and frying any bird that happened to fly through

It's not like that's going to stop tech development. Hell, birds can fly into plane or helicopter engines and it doesn't just kill the bird, it can easily disable the aircraft as well, and it's not like that stopped us from using them. Might sound cold, but that's how things are.

60

bookers555 t1_j139d3z wrote

Blame congress, not engineering, the Space Shuttle we got is completely different from what NASA envisioned of just having a small, reusable space "taxi" to let people come and go from space stations, not the big, clunky, ultra expensive behemoth it ended up being.

It's a miracle that thing only blew up twice.

Not that I'm saying the Soyuz is unreliable if it is true it was just a micrometeorite.

3

bookers555 t1_j1246ch wrote

NASA relies on government funding so they need to jerk politicians in whatever they ask if they want funds, and diversity is all the current rage in US politics.

So you just tell them yes to whatever they say, take the billions and run before they start asking for specifics regarding the technology that's going to be used, it's already enough that they demanded the SLS to reuse old Space Shuttle tech just to prevent their buddies from losing their jobs.

−1

bookers555 t1_iy82r0t wrote

I've always through the opposite, what if they know about us, they have us monitored, but they are simply avoiding all contact because they think we are "not ready".

Imagine if there's a super advanced civilization, or a group of civilizations that have entire databases on "developing worlds" and we are just one entry in them.

But sadly the world is rarely as interesting as we imagine.

1

bookers555 t1_ixeoltu wrote

The technology that comes from space travel absolutely does help with our lives.

If it wasn't for the Apollo program computers wouldn't be nearly as advanced today, for example, and the ISS helps, not just with weather tracking, but with deforestation and crop tracking, along with the myriad of satellites we have. Other things that have come from space travel research are water filters, anti-corrosion coating, scratch resistant eye glasses, hearing-aid devices...

And since you care about the enviroment, i'll tell you that, in order to reduce the polution created by rocket launches, specially the one on natural soil around launch bases, they came up with a little something called emulsified zero-valent iron, a solution that can be injected in groundwater and eliminates a huge variety of chemicals that can be a huge risk to the enviroment. For 10 years now this thing has been used by a ton of companies from oil to chemical companies, and helps reduce their enviromental impact significantly. It's NASA's most succesful licensed product so far, too.

And if you care about money, are you really going to throw a fit over NASA's yearly budget of 25 billion, when the US military has one of 750 billion and they haven't fought any real conflicts for more than 20 years, and 80 since it fought a conflict that actually affected the US?

5