The bottom of this comment section is extremely uneducated on the workings of this process.

Gronk hurt worse tbh, we could have won another Super Bowl that year

Unbelievable that someone could hold this opinion when Perry could have given 0 and you wouldn't have even had this idiotic thought enter your dinosaur-sized brain

Whoops, there went their entire argument

My money is on John Cena

20% increase in performance with a 23% drop in power usage. Even with the numbers being tested in a lab and not the real world environment, that's crazy

Due diligence.

But the fact of the matter is does it constitute a betrayal of public interest with regards to anti-trust laws? You're talking about one company taking over one other company in a highly competitive business environment. This doesn't constitute illegal antitrust, not under the current laws.

I mean, I've been subbed to Futurology since pretty much the beginning. I never post, very rarely comment, and most of the posts are fantastical ideas with no ability to be put into any sort of mass production or provide anything for society. I wouldn't say this is a new problem, it's just a side effect of AskScience and other science subs being very heavily moderated and tightly controlled. This is just a loosely controlled sub, which fills a niche in Reddit.

Like you though, I usually find most posts here to be an extension of ShowerThoughts, but with a science vibe to them.

OP has never heard of paragraphs or text readability, I don't believe

Accidentally??? Fox reports this as "accidentally" suuuuuure lol

Lawyers get 35-40% of that too

I'll accept $10 in Google Play credits as settlement and then spend it in CoC

Phantussy

Yeah those percentages would never be backed up by any sources, total malarkey

My grandmother and her 3 weeks expired milk would like a word with you about your waste