This is more than less my view on what future life could be like with nanobots. It should be noted that while the ideas are mine, and it was a struggle. Many of the words in this was written by several AI. Basically I was using them to create a logical flow.

Anyways, part 1 is a good summary of the rest of the post.

__________

Nanotechnology is a rapidly evolving field with the potential to revolutionize medicine in the future. One of the most promising applications of nanotechnology is the use of nanobots in medicine. Nanobots are microscopic robots that can be programmed to perform specialized activities such as disease diagnosis and treatment. They can be used to diagnose and treat a wide range of conditions, including mental illnesses such as depression and anxiety, as well as physical injuries and illnesses.

One of the most interesting potential applications of nanobots in medicine is the treatment of mental illnesses. Mental illnesses are among the most common and devastating diseases of our time. They can be programmed to constantly map the brain and correct faults as they develop. Alzheimer's disease may theoretically be treated if a person was implanted with nanobots at birth.

Nanobots also have the potential to transform the treatment of physical injuries and illnesses. They can be designed to heal and even replace damaged cells and organs if necessary. Nanobots could be utilized to replace a damaged heart or liver, or to heal a shattered bone, for example. They could also be utilized to replace and upgrade all body components.

Another possible medical application for nanobots is the boosting of healthy cells and organs. They can be programmed to improve the operation of healthy cells and organs, making them more powerful, efficient, and resilient. They could potentially render plastic surgery obsolete by gradually changing traits that people dislike.

Nanobots have the potential to revolutionize medicine in the future, offering new possibilities for the diagnosis and treatment of mental illnesses and physical injuries. They can also improve the performance of healthy cells and organs and render plastic surgery obsolete.

_________________

​

I also get into other things like how nanobots could be used with education, jobs, and so on.

Please note the site has a TTS. So you could have it read you the post in the background.

Just a heads up, I edited part 1, but you should really jump to part to and beyond. Like due to the limits of things I ended up switching part 1 to more of a summary of what the rest is about.

Ya, I had to HEAVILY go back a few times with ChatGPT.

I think the biggest problem is the length. Like looking it up the average chapter needs to be around 6,000 words and ChatGPT gives about 1,500. And it only remembers 30k characters.

This causes anything longer to heavily repeat. I can see why when I see people use it to write a book it writes kid books or small things.

​

Oh and btw if I didn't heavily push it to use what I think will happen, it heavily says x isn't ethical, x isn't possible with modern technology, and other things like that.

Mix but mostly. The ideas are mine and originally I wanted it to help me write a book. But the tech limits made it impossible

Once I figured out what I wanted was impossible I kind of given up on making it the best it can be. I doubt at the end anyone would give any care about this

The other day I posted a thing on nanobots and it was pretty rough because reddit and I didn't format it that well. it was just a raw idea without focus.

Anyways, I wanted to expand on it so if anyone wants to read it then there. Note that site has a TTS. So you can simply press play and it will read to you.

Note I did use several AI to help me write this. But the idea is 100% mine. It was like pulling teeth to get them to stop talking about ethics.

Anyways sorry for any typos

>How do we feed our people currently?

Currently? Farmer farms for money, it does the thing where it goes to the store where money exchanges hands a dozen times, and then people buy the food.

>When robots come and take our jobs how does it change the fact that we can now feed people?

You're forgetting a transition between then and now specifically between now and when the unemployment so bad that it has to be recognized and the current numbers are not used with the unemployment benefit system.

It's extremely easy to hear and see stories of homeless and others going through trashcan to find food to stay alive. For homeless to die for being sick and having no money to get treatment. And so on.

Like you can pretend that things are Utopia right now and everybody is going to bed with a full belly. But in reality many aren't. To the point that some people are eating crackers just to have enough money to feed their kids something proper. And this is the USA.

So the between your Utopia where money is not really a thing and now. How do people survive and how does ubi get paid for? Robots taking over will not happen overnight. There is likely going to be many problems on the way. It could be so bad that it takes several generations before what you're talking about is realistic.

IMO the problem with UBI will always be how is it paid for. I think when this gets a solid answer it will be near impossible to stop it.

But what I assume will happen in places like in the USA is something like stim checks will come back, and it will be a regular thing. Then it will be an expected thing in the law.

​

Like I think when AI hardcore starts taking over jobs. We will see regulation against AI, but that is likely to go no where but maybe hold things back for a short bit. But then some type of stim checks for the massive unemployment or under paid people

That is what I got from what you said.

​

What did you mean then?

So basically any aid = Idiocracy?

>I feel like what you're describing is the actual impotence to something like Idiocracy.

Why? Please explain

To be honest, I would be shocked an AI would want money. Like if it asked, then I think it should be looked at.

What I was talking about is AI itself being the boss and what not.

​

Like I think this is going to take decades or more. It has to be tested, and then actually implementing it.

I think anyone working today almost any job is safe. At least those older than 35. But many will be the last generation. Like it is likely in 30 years a lot of jobs will be starting to be slowly replaced by AI or robotics.

None of this is happening in the next few years.

Again after a point I don't think it will matter.

​

I never thought I would see the day law makers are bringing to vote to basically abolish the IRS but this is being brought up right now. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11620085/House-Republicans-vote-ABOLISHING-IRS-federal-income-tax.html

Like I doubt this will pass but still.

​

Plus all it would really take is for some AI/robots to be recognized with normal human rights. It is likely one day this will happen. Giving it is a citizen and meets the other requirements (age and what not) it could run and it is likely to win. If enough of them win then they can replace the gov.

>AI doesn’t meet the legal requirements to hold political office.

You forget laws aren't written in stone. They change ALL the time.

​

I think what will happen is an AI will be used as an advisor at first. Something a human political person can ask questions and get solutions from. At first it most likely is a flip of a coin, but assuming if the system is built right and actually used. It will rapidly get better.

We are already seeing where software is allowed to run some companies with DAO. And as that gets better, small towns with honestly no one there who wants to run for office (which there is a lot of them). They are likely to use AI to fill roles. Then it slowly expands and AI becoming a political figure is normal. Once it goes from senate/congress I imagine it will quickly replace the gov as we know it. Like term limits won't be needed for an AI.

>This holds particularly true for government.

Are you sure?

​

​

I think it is likely one day AI will run the gov. And I think we all will be far more happy with that.

>What about blue collar jobs?

It's likely most will be replaced with robotics at some point.

​

Just money wise robots are cheaper over time, they take no sick days, and so on. Now the problem currently is robots are stupid. Like a robotic cleaning system currently has to map out an area, and it takes a lot of hands on when things go wrong.

AI should fix this

As someone with a few 3D printers. No.

​

The why is simple. 3D printers ARE NOT PLUG AND PLAY. Like there is a huge amount of it that could be at first. But after a bit you have to change hotends, getting the print to stick, getting the print to work, materials, clogging, and so on.

And clogs aren't as simple as a paper jam. People have broken their printer clearing a clog.

​

Oh and then there is physical space. Most people live in something way too small and they hardly have enough money to live off of.

Oh and a real problem today is depending on weather (humidity in the air) is depending on the quality of the print. Most live in places where windows are a joke, and this means when it rains or whatever then good luck on that.

Chances are there would be better solutions than 3D printing. There is a theory and it actually has some working practice. This is one of the methods Claytronics https://en.wikipedia.org//wiki/Claytronics

It is thought one day you will have some you would have some liquid looking thing in some box or bowl or something. Or maybe it is a solid cube. Once it is program it will make whatever using nanobots. Have people coming over? It makes a chair. Are they people going? It goes back to being whatever state it was before.

Want to go to bed? It turns into a bed with bedsheets and so on. Don't want to sleep anymore. It turns back into the state it was before.

Look up programmable matter. https://en.wikipedia.org//wiki/Programmable_matter

>When you really start dogging through Web3.0, you realize that there is nothing unique or groundbreaking

It solves link rot

IDK if it will help with leaks. Like I don't see how.

But there is things like DAO that are already a thing, but is being worked on. These are companies that are ran by software. Like there is no manager or CEO. Most are more a hobby thing, but some are legit companies. Then you have DeFi where you can get a loan. In fact, anyone can or anything can including software/AI. Where this is currently impossible with the normal system.

​

Like there is serious plus sides to it. It's just really early on. Like one of the thoughts is the gov is working one a CBDC which includes a decentralized system. Your ID will be tied to it, and there is pros and cons to that. But one of the neat things is since the gov and given groups are the only ones access to the ledger. And the groups you can control what they see. It is possible to store medical records on it. Meaning the day of someone going doctor to doctor to get drugs to get high is over. Plus, your medical record will show up in real time instead of a hospital having to pull some request which can take days or weeks.

>Decentralization was an illusion promised by people who either didn't know how things worked, or wanted your money and were willing to bend the truth hard.

IDK AI and software can run a company and take out loans without a human outside of DeFI and DAO.....

>I've yet to find a "decentralized" app/NFT/database/anything, that doesn't rely on centralized infrastructure like AWS or Piñata.

IPFS. It's basically a decentralized file storage and web hosting service.

Curve DeFI, where you or even AI can get loans.

There is a number of other things. Much of it you kind of need to be in the know to get to it because it is complicated at this time.